Due to people tagging sexual oreintaion, ive been dealing with a massive overloading spike of male female solo tagged images.
People are going to continue to tag badly untill someone finally finds the perfect deterrent.
either way right now these tags are linked together and because of this that hot babe you've been looking for was blacklisted because the owner chose to tag his or her sexual oreintation thus adding a straight tag, which adds the male tag, who doesn't exist...

Straight male solo female

Then we have the solo tag. Lets get an example shall we,
female cat w/faceless males floating disembodied cock fucking her in the ass.... not solo!

Orientation needs to be re-qddressed, as it seems to be becoming forgotten due to not being able to find it.
Honestly the important rules such as gender, outside information and when to use it, ect ect need to be put in bold red text between the saved tags and the edit box on the edit tag page. Should say something like, "STOP! Read this before tagging."

Some of these tags I look after have gotten so bad I ignore them now and stick to single edits... simply more errors coming in than being fixed.

Esme_Belles said:
Straight male solo female

Hm. I think I see the problem with that one.

It was ruled that solo males with cum in their ass are to be tagged as gay. But by the same logic...
post #298155 post #419519
...solo females such as those are straight. And straight is implicated to both male and female.

Then we have the solo tag. Lets get an example shall we,
female cat w/faceless males floating disembodied cock fucking her in the ass.... not solo!

I don't see many of those out there. Though solo female penis definitely needs good scrubbing.

And while looking at it, I noticed that some users have tagged dickgirls with catgirl and rabbitgirl. So those get implicated as female. Both are in need of a clean up. That's an another strike against gender-specific species tags.

EDIT: ...the catgirl wiki says that those aren't even supposed to be used anymore. We probably should invalidate them?

I guess I will have to remove those implications if it is not consistent

Rainbow_Dash said:
I guess I will have to remove those implications if it is not consistent

I don't think it needs to be tagged as straight, if that makes any sense? We see a single female with cum inside her. There is no male, and they are not shown to be making love to each other- I'd tag it with aftermath and be done with it, since there are many ways that that situation could have happened- even a lesbian lover with a cumming strapon. In the image above with the vulpix, she doesn't look very happy, for example, in tears, and she looks fucked almost raw. It looks like a case of abuse to me.

A guy with cum in his ass though? Unless it's obviously rape, I've yet to see a case for where it isn't depicted in the vast majority as a gay male enjoying their stuffing. Yes, there are going to be a few images in the vast sea of them, but I think it's common enough that it should be the standard.

Genjar said:
It was ruled that solo males with cum in their ass are to be tagged as gay.

By my memory, I'm pretty sure the ruling was the other way. I can't remember the discussion properly, but I disagree with that ruling if it was that way.

Seven_Twenty said:
By my memory, I'm pretty sure the ruling was the other way. I can't remember the discussion properly, but I disagree with that ruling if it was that way.

Check Ippiki's comments here: forum #84236
Though that's four months old, so I suppose it might've been discussed again since then.

But here's an another ruling from two months ago that confirms it:
post #404233
(Check the comments.)

To my knowledge we've never endorsed tagging solo female creampies as straight. The whole male + buttcum = gay thing was Arc's policy and just sort of stuck around. I don't really care what comes of it, but I do know people searching gay like to see that kind of stuff and straight needs to imply male and female.

I honestly think that we could do without the implication of having cum in ass on a male making it gay, as there are other ways that could have gotten there, like tentacles and the like, or females using squirting toys (which as far as I remember is not considered gay, may be wrong on that though) and thusly the tag would best be added manually if it is needed, same case for female with cum dripping out

Anyone have another view on it?

Rainbow_Dash said:
I honestly think that we could do without the implication of having cum in ass on a male making it gay, as there are other ways that could have gotten there, like tentacles and the like, or females using squirting toys (which as far as I remember is not considered gay, may be wrong on that though) and thusly the tag would best be added manually if it is needed, same case for female with cum dripping out

Anyone have another view on it?

123easy said:
I don't think it needs to be tagged as straight, if that makes any sense? We see a single female with cum inside her. There is no male, and they are not shown to be making love to each other- I'd tag it with aftermath and be done with it, since there are many ways that that situation could have happened- even a lesbian lover with a cumming strapon. In the image above with the vulpix, she doesn't look very happy, for example, in tears, and she looks fucked almost raw. It looks like a case of abuse to me.

A guy with cum in his ass though? Unless it's obviously rape, I've yet to see a case for where it isn't depicted in the vast majority as a gay male enjoying their stuffing. Yes, there are going to be a few images in the vast sea of them, but I think it's common enough that it should be the standard.

To summarize: Simple as assuming that a disembodied cock is male by default- someone put that cum in there, so default = male. male on male = gay, unless rape was involved. Guy with buttcum = something gay males will probably want to see, others may want to not see it unless they specifically search for it; still others might want to blacklist it because to them it is gay and they only want to see straight. *shrugs*