Topic: Lockheed Martin aircraft

The bulk update request #12956 is pending approval.

create alias f-22 (137) -> f-22_raptor (49)
create implication f-22_raptor (49) -> lockheed_martin (127)
create alias sr-71 (62) -> sr-71_blackbird (152)
create implication sr-71_blackbird (152) -> lockheed_martin (127)
create implication sr-72 (26) -> lockheed_martin (127)
create alias f-35 (125) -> f-35_lightning_ii (57)
create implication f-35_lightning_ii (57) -> lockheed_martin (127)

Reason: Small bur to consolidate redundant aircraft tags and imply their manufacturer, in this case Lockheed Martin (hopefully I've done this in the correct order)

Do you think we ought to also alias F-22 to F-22 Raptor (with the implication to Lockheed_Martin attached to the latter) as well? I like your idea of aliasing SR-71 and F-35 to SR-71 Blackbird and F-35 Lightning II. The longer names look more descriptive to me. (Obviously, since they haven't given the SR-72 a name beyond its designation, it wouldn't be so aliasable. We can do that in the future.)

clawstripe said:
Do you think we ought to also alias F-22 to F-22 Raptor (with the implication to Lockheed_Martin attached to the latter) as well? I like your idea of aliasing SR-71 and F-35 to SR-71 Blackbird and F-35 Lightning II. The longer names look more descriptive to me. (Obviously, since they haven't given the SR-72 a name beyond its designation, it wouldn't be so aliasable. We can do that in the future.)

Agreed on the 22; I will edit the bur

lust_demon_laz said:
Agreed on the 22; I will edit the bur

This should reflect on your other BURs as well so that the naming convention is consistent; e.g., f-14_tomcat on topic #61226, a-10_thunderbolt_ii on topic #61228, etc.
Also consider any other tags and implications that involve "vague" sounding designations that not everybody would know about.