Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #70489 feral_corruption -> corruption is pending approval.
Reason: since i made the tag feral_corruption upon getting requests for doing so, i think it would make sense to add some implications like corruption (in a more general sense).
take care!
syn-6
syn-6 said:
...
Out of curiosity, what does feral_corruption implies that is not already covered by the 2 tags feral + corruption
The idea of tag for getting enticed, seduced, or giving into bestiality is valid. However, feral_corruption could also be interpreted as someone behaving in a feral way, undergoing physical changes making them feral, or just "a corrupted feral", so it doesn't fit the idea very well.
Bestiality should be mentioned in the name, with something like enticed_into_bestiality.
waydence said:
The idea of tag for getting enticed, seduced, or giving into bestiality is valid. However, feral_corruption could also be interpreted as someone behaving in a feral way, undergoing physical changes making them feral, or just "a corrupted feral", so it doesn't fit the idea very well.Bestiality should be mentioned in the name, with something like enticed_into_bestiality.
ahh yea that makes sense! Perhaps... although "bestiality temptaion" already exists... so maybe my tag proposal is redudant to begin with?
In the future if you have an idea for a new tag you should probably create a set to demonstrate the kind of posts you expect it to have and see if you could find enough posts to warrant a new tag in the first place. Creating the tag immediately will invite other people to use it even if you're not certain it needs to exist yet.
There are already multiple tags describing this concept (bestiality_temptation as mentioned, feral_temptation), so these should be aliased into one.
eightoflakes said:
In the future if you have an idea for a new tag you should probably create a set to demonstrate the kind of posts you expect it to have and see if you could find enough posts to warrant a new tag in the first place. Creating the tag immediately will invite other people to use it even if you're not certain it needs to exist yet.
Tangentially, perhaps this should be stated somewhere in the tagging guidelines? I never even thought to use sets this way before reading about it on the forums.
beholding said:
Tangentially, perhaps this should be stated somewhere in the tagging guidelines? I never even thought to use sets this way before reading about it on the forums.
Yeah that should be mentioned more. I'd have 25% less edits if I knew that was an option.
eightoflakes said:
In the future if you have an idea for a new tag you should probably create a set to demonstrate the kind of posts you expect it to have and see if you could find enough posts to warrant a new tag in the first place. Creating the tag immediately will invite other people to use it even if you're not certain it needs to exist yet.There are already multiple tags describing this concept (bestiality_temptation as mentioned, feral_temptation), so these should be aliased into one.
ah well, alright then! The mods or janitors can remove the tag. Its no problem :)
