Topic: Tag implication: casual_nudity -> nude

The tag implication #70465 casual_nudity -> nude is pending approval.

Reason: casual nudity should imply nudity

Might need some cleanup. There are some posts tagged casual_nudity that aren't fully nude, and should probably be tagged casual_exposure instead.

This was previously rejected on topic #21187.
The problem was people were (and still is) using this tag for mostly_nude characters as well, but what @Watsit said is right as casual_exposure is supposed to be the right tag to use for clothed characters who are also "casually nude" in a sense.

Then, it doesn't help that there is a third tag combining both casual_nudity and casual_exposure, which is called social_nudity (which should NOT imply nude).
IMO, I would love for all three of these tags to be aliased together into one tag and have people specify the level of nudity separately.

I have stopped using the casual_nudity tag. I find it easier to use the nude tag if the character is wearing nothing at all, and the mostly_nude tag if he's wearing at least one piece of clothing while his genitals are exposed.
I don't think I have ever used the casual_exposure tag either. These tags are too specific for me.