Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #70449 chris_(crizbn) -> nonbinary_(lore) has been rejected.
Reason: Character's reference sheet outlines that the character in question is genderless but goes by he/him pronouns.
EDIT: The tag implication chris_(crizbn) -> nonbinary_(lore) (forum #473644) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
we don't imply lore tags to characters. a it is possible for a post to have a character be shown as having a gender identity other than what is the norm for them.
If you consider possible scenarios in which someone is cosplaying as them or they're from an AU in which they aren't nonbinary, you'll see our reasoning behind what dfn-451 said above.
The tag implication chris_(crizbn) -> nonbinary_(lore) (forum #473644) has been rejected by @furrypickle.
dba_afish said:
we don't imply lore tags to characters. a it is possible for a post to have a character be shown as having a gender identity other than what is the norm for them.
Also can you imagine what a organizational nightmare it would be if we opened that particular floodgate? Suddenly you've got hundreds of implication requests coming in, no one can possibly handle them all... and even in an ideal scenario the "male_(lore)" and "female_(lore)" wiki pages each end up with a list of implications that encompasses like 40% of all the green tags on the entire site, stretches into infinity, and lags the entire server every time it's visited.
errorist said:
each end up with a list of implications that encompasses like 40% of all the green tags on the entire site, stretches into infinity, and lags the entire server every time it's visited.
The story goes that this is the exact reason we have the pokemon generation tags
