Implicating all pokemon → pokémon
Link to implication pokemon&implied_to=pokémon

Reason:

The list is too long and I don't know what ones are already implicated, but every pokémon that exists should imply pokémon

I don't think anyone needs convincing that each pokemon should imply pokémon. The only reason some don't is that they occasionally slip through the cracks. It's more helpful if we point out specific tags that are missing an implication.

EDIT: Actually, after checking the implication list, it seems like there are less than 70 implications to pokémon right now. To fix this, we would have to make individial implication requests for the remaining ~650. Wow, a lot of work.

Yep, and most of them are already listed: forum #84491
Just missing the newest generation.

I suppose the admins simply haven't had time to handle those.

It's a lot of tedious work when most people remember to tag it pokemon anyways. They're quite likely very low priority.

yeah let me just go do that

If I had the power, I'd do it. I think it really wouldn't take longer than 2 hours if I were to work diligently.

Jesus... looking at Ippiki's mod action list, how does he even find time to do anything other than ban Reaper Eternal?

123easy said:
Jesus... looking at Ippiki's mod action list, how does he even find time to do anything other than ban Reaper Eternal?

He has help.

Not enough it seems. Good fucking lord.

If someone actually made these implications then we would have enough pending implications for a whole decade judging by how quick others are accepted.

Judging by what was posted in forum #84491, the only person who should add these implications is an admin who can avoid creating a forum thread for each one, and presumably an admin would also be able to approve them all in one batch.

So I guess we just have to sit tight and wait for an admin to find the time. Which may take a while considering all the Reaper banning that needs to be done around here, as 123easy points out.

Wyvrn said:
Judging by what was posted in forum #84491, the only person who should add these implications is an admin who can avoid creating a forum thread for each one, and presumably an admin would also be able to approve them all in one batch.

So I guess we just have to it tight and wait for an admin to find the time. Which may take a while considering all the Reaper banning that needs to be done around here, as 123easy points out.

Also not all pokemons really need implication. If they are only on pictures where all pokedex is displayed then it doesn't make sense to make implication. For example AFAIK nobody has taste bad enough to draw fanart of binacle, so I don't think it need implication right now.

nobody has taste bad enough to draw fanart of binacle

Thanks to Halite, we now have or very first Binacle pic on the site. Thanks, man!

EDIT: Oh damn, it's a whole series.

Wyvrn said:
Well, somebody did. At least they remembered to tag pokémon too.

>Pixiv
Oh Japan, you never stop to amaze me.

I really enjoy how so many Japanese artists make image series through just minor alterations to a single image. It's not as awesome as series of completely different images of course, but it lets artists create sequential art at only a fraction of the effort.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
...nobody has taste bad enough to draw fanart of binacle...

ORLY?

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
>Pixiv
Oh Japan, you never stop to amaze me.

I think you mean, "you never cease to amaze me" or "you never stop amazing me".

That said, they have the perfect shape for double-penetration. How could you expect there to NOT be porn of it?

Wyvrn said:
I really enjoy how so many Japanese artists make image series through just minor alterations to a single image. It's not as awesome as series of completely different images of course, but it lets artists create sequential art at only a fraction of the effort.

Would rather they make a short animation of it than just the very minor image swaps, myself.

Halite said:
ORLY?

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Oh Japan, you never stop cease to amaze me.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
...nobody has taste bad enough to draw fanart of binacle, so I don't think it need implication right now.

I feel as though there would be more rediculous, hilarious an quite possibly memetic porn of both it and its evolution if the public were educated on this one simple fact:
The barnacle has the largest penis to body ratio in the animal kingdom. Its shlong can grow to be up to 40 times the size of its body!
That means that a Binacle's penis can be up to 20 meters long and Barbaracle's penis could be a whopping 52 meters long![/i]

FatherOfGray said:
I feel as though there would be more rediculous, hilarious an quite possibly memetic porn of both it and its evolution if the public were educated on this one simple fact:
The barnacle has the largest penis to body ratio in the animal kingdom. Its shlong can grow to be up to 40 times the size of its body!
That means that a Binacle's penis can be up to 20 meters long and Barbaracle's penis could be a whopping 52 meters long![/i]

But we already have tons of tentacle porn...