Topic: Implicate social_nudity -> group_nudity

The bulk update request #12508 is pending approval.

create implication social_nudity (3229) -> group_nudity (3345)
create implication social_nudity (3229) -> casual_nudity (24671)

Reason: The wiki for social_nudity describes it as a group of characters engaging in casual_nudity. These implications should therefore apply in all tagged cases.

Based off the wikis:

• social_nudity = 2+ characters who are nude, mostly_nude, or partially_nude
• group_nudity = 3+ characters who are nude or mostly_nude
• casual_nudity = 1+ character who is nude

This creates problems if the wikis are correct.

crocogator said:
Based off the wikis:

• social_nudity = 2+ characters who are nude, mostly_nude, or partially_nude
• group_nudity = 3+ characters who are nude or mostly_nude
• casual_nudity = 1+ character who is nude

This creates problems if the wikis are correct.

Ah, based on the definition of group, yes, that would seem to be correct. I'm not sure the distinction matters, though. Honestly, I'm not sure if we need two separate tags for this at all?