Topic: Nude_[gender]-implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #12486 is pending approval.

create implication nude_male (62815) -> male (2967152)
create implication nude_male (62815) -> nude (1457929) # duplicate of implication #67375
create implication nude_female (68468) -> female (2971423)
create implication nude_gynomorph (5812) -> gynomorph (230921)
create implication nude_gynomorph (5812) -> nude_intersex (5355) # duplicate of implication #67377
create implication nude_herm (495) -> herm (31490)
create implication nude_herm (495) -> nude_intersex (5355) # duplicate of implication #67379
create implication nude_maleherm (267) -> maleherm (5499)
create implication nude_maleherm (267) -> nude_intersex (5355) # duplicate of implication #67380
create implication nude_andromorph (1287) -> andromorph (29203)
create implication nude_andromorph (1287) -> nude_intersex (5355) # duplicate of implication #67378
create implication nude_intersex (5355) -> nude (1457929) # duplicate of implication #67376
create implication nude_intersex (5355) -> intersex (295147)

Reason: These tags inherently require the picture to include someone of the relevant gender-tag and nude-tag to be valid in the first place.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/60121