Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #69424 tongue_on_glass -> licking_glass has been rejected.
Reason: Maybe this warrants an implication when a character is licking the glass... I don't know.
EDIT: The tag implication tongue_on_glass -> licking_glass (forum #469242) has been rejected by @cabo27judy.
Updated
The prefer tag here is tongue_on_glass and on_glass
alias licking_glass -> tongue_on_glass
the tongue_on_* type of tags don't seems that populated, and there are barely any implications (2 active ones, by tongue_on_glass itself) let alone active aliases.
So the question is, is it necessary? Do we want these type of tags?
snpthecat said:
the tongue_on_* type of tags don't seems that populated, and there are barely any implications (2 active ones, by tongue_on_glass itself) let alone active aliases.So the question is, is it necessary? Do we want these type of tags?
tongue_on_glass (112) is almost as populated as licking_glass (176), so it can go either way.
The real question is do we want the tags to have a standard form or not. The *on_glass family is everything to do with pressing something against a glass that gives that look.
Personally, that alias shouldn't pass since licking don't have to show that "flesh pressed against glass"
BUT, if you really want to make an alias: use the standard form
snpthecat said:
the tongue_on_* type of tags don't seems that populated, and there are barely any implications (2 active ones, by tongue_on_glass itself) let alone active aliases.So the question is, is it necessary? Do we want these type of tags?
Out of curiosity, how can you see the active implications and aliases?
bleakdragoon said:
Out of curiosity, how can you see the active implications and aliases?
https://e621.net/tag_implications
https://e621.net/tag_aliases
The tag implication tongue_on_glass -> licking_glass (forum #469242) has been rejected by @cabo27judy.
