so i was tagging a post about a character who is bisexual when i noticed that the "female" tag got implied, despite the character being solo
shouldn't female be implied with bigender and not bisexual?
Posted under General
so i was tagging a post about a character who is bisexual when i noticed that the "female" tag got implied, despite the character being solo
shouldn't female be implied with bigender and not bisexual?
bisexual describes when a male or female character is engaging in sexual, suggestive, or romantic activity with a character of the same sex and a character of the opposite sex within the same image.
It's not a sexuality tag.
istole50watermelons said:
so i was tagging a post about a character who is bisexual when i noticed that the "female" tag got implied, despite the character being soloshouldn't female be implied with bigender and not bisexual?
The bisexual tag is for group sexual activities involving both male and female characters (2+ males and 1+ female, OR 1+ male and 2+ females). It has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Currently, we don't tag sexual orientations. Lore tags like bisexual_(lore) have been proposed, but have not been created.
crocogator said:
The bisexual tag is for group sexual activities involving both male and female characters (2+ males and 1+ female, OR 1+ male and 2+ females). It has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Currently, we don't tag sexual orientations. Lore tags like bisexual_(lore) have been proposed, but have not been created.
Ah ok, thanks for the clear-up