The tag implication #69411 orgasm_from_compliment -> orgasm is pending approval.
Reason: It's a small tag but an orgasm is an orgasm.
Topic: Tag implication: orgasm_from_compliment -> orgasm
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Should it imply spontaneous_ejaculation instead? If a character orgasms from being complimented, that would be without any physical stimulation. If there is physical stimulation, it might not be the compliment causing the orgasm rather than the physical contact.
watsit said:
Should it imply spontaneous_ejaculation instead? If a character orgasms from being complimented, that would be without any physical stimulation. If there is physical stimulation, it might not be the compliment causing the orgasm rather than the physical contact.
Orgasms do not always involve ejaculations.
ruppari said:
Orgasms do not always involve ejaculations.
I was gonna say "hands-free" but apparently that implies ejaculation as well, for some reason.
ruppari said:
Orgasms do not always involve ejaculations.
This is true. However, variations of spontaneous_orgasm are aliased to spontaneous_ejaculation.
emionix said:
This is true. However, variations of spontaneous_orgasm are aliased to spontaneous_ejaculation.
Well that is not right. Why on earth that was done? If anything, it should be implication, and other way around.
edit: And unrelated to the topic at hand, but related to what I said: is there particular reason for why ejaculation does not imply orgasm?
ruppari said:
Well that is not right. Why on earth that was done? If anything, it should be implication, and other way around.
alias #43308
A former admin liked to make aliases and implication trees without consulting anyone
Why am I starting to sense a theme of people sort of collectively forgetting that a penis ejaculating cum is not the only kind of orgasm that is possible to have and portray in art?