The passionate tag is a subjective emotion tag, and currently has no wiki description to clarify matters. The vast majority of images are just characters having sex. Does this tag have a legitimate purpose?
Updated
Topic: Should "passionate" be invalidated? [Now with BUR!]
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
Ehhh doesn’t seem like a useful tag personally
The bulk update request #12419 is pending approval.
remove alias passion (0) -> passionate (1882)
Reason:
Followup
alias passion -> invalid_tag alias passionate -> invalid_tag
After 1 month with no defenders, I think I'm justified in making this request.
Never really thought about this until now but I guess it doesn't make sense to tag emotions. It's probably better to tag what's conveying emotions instead, e.g. smile/frown, narrowed_eyes, etc.
eightoflakes said:
Never really thought about this until now but I guess it doesn't make sense to tag emotions. It's probably better to tag what's conveying emotions instead, e.g. smile/frown, narrowed_eyes, etc.
No, you can absolutely TWYS with emotions.
Good luck tagging nervous, angry, and sad.
beholding said:
The bulk update request #12419 is pending approval.remove alias passion (0) -> passionate (1882)
Reason:
Followup
alias passion -> invalid_tag alias passionate -> invalid_tagAfter 1 month with no defenders, I think I'm justified in making this request.
Alias to intimate instead.
Updated
The bulk update request #12424 is pending approval.
create alias passionate (1882) -> intimate (5221) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur
Reason: Current usage is the same as intimate.
Wiki page of intimate:
Getting up close to someone usually in a romantic kind of way. This tag can be used for a wide variety of romantic themes, as well as being useful in distinguishing the erotic scenes from the hard and rough sex.
I disagree. Intimate, at least in this setting, is used to describe the setting/theme, not emotions of the setting.
Example: An intimate setting (decorated with candles and flowers, etc.) but there's only one person, and they're crying because the other person never showed up. That would have intimate, but definitely wouldn't be passionate.
as well as being useful in distinguishing the erotic scenes from the hard and rough sex
This seems rather the opposite of "passion", no?