Topic: Big balls count as hypergenitalia?

Posted under Off Topic

My question and doubt is that I've been really interested lately in fursonas, OCs, and characters with disproportionately big balls (like Horses or Tanukis).

So, the question is... would that already count as Hyper Genitalia?
From what point forward, could it be considered Hypergenitalia?
and in which species is it more acceptable to see this?

I ask this last question since I have wanted to implement that in my fursona and since it is a German Shepherd, I have been told that it is unusual and curious to see that in canines, so what are your opinions?

I mean, it depends on how disproportionate they are. Disproportionately large body parts is pretty much the definition of hyper, but if those balls sizes are a standard for a given species, I'd say that's closer ro feral.

So I'd you made a tanuki fursona with huge nuts, I'd say that it's closer to feral. If you were to put emphasis on how big the balls are, then it transitions into hyper

Personally I'd say there's a difference between 'big balls that do not look too disproportionate and do not make you question how the character moves' and 'hyper balls'.

They would be hyper if they are unrealistically large. If they're just slightly bigger, it would just fall under "big_balls"

colinthelucario said:
They would be hyper if they are unrealistically large. If they're just slightly bigger, it would just fall under "big_balls"

There's also huge_balls. hyper is for way past just unrealistically large.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/59352