Topic: M furry on human F

Makes me sad that this doesn’t get as much art as the reverse order does (m human on F Furry) Its a big turn on for me~
https://e621.net/posts/4142338?q=donutella

https://e621.net/posts/5714914?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_on_anthro

https://e621.net/posts/4295490?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_on_anthro

https://e621.net/posts/2281315?pool_id=14580

https://e621.net/posts/2967928?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_penetrated

https://e621.net/posts/2014020?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_penetrated

What are your favorite pics about this?

Though it doesn't get as much love, the disparity isn't too big, less than 3x the other at least
female_human male_anthro male/female human_on_anthro vs female_anthro male_human male/female human_on_anthro
(or at least on the ones tagged properly)

The disparity is far worse on Pixiv. Human Male/Furry Female or Human Male/Female Pokemon? Tons. Other combinations? GL w/that!

monapaws said:
Makes me sad that this doesn’t get as much art as the reverse order does (m human on F Furry) Its a big turn on for me~
https://e621.net/posts/4142338?q=donutella

https://e621.net/posts/5714914?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_on_anthro

https://e621.net/posts/4295490?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_on_anthro

https://e621.net/posts/2281315?pool_id=14580

https://e621.net/posts/2967928?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_penetrated

https://e621.net/posts/2014020?q=fav%3AMonaPaws+human_penetrated

What are your favorite pics about this?

Same, I think M furry on human F is super nice.
I think from those pics it's either the last one or the one with nidalee.

People into furry content are looking mostly for anthro and feral content and these spaces are predominantly male or catering to male interests. Maybe something has changed, but I recall art of human females with anthro and feral males being much more common a decade or so ago.

It's still probably still the case if you leave furry spaces . However, the majority of the people who want to see human females with anthro and feral males will usually be men who prefer the males to be repulsive in some way. These males will be less likely be tagged with terms furry communities typically use, including even being acknowledged as furry. You have to search for things like minotaur, werewolf, orc, monster, bestiality, etc. Now, if you want to see males who are actual characters intended to be desired instead of primitive/thuggish men and dumb animals, that's gonna be a lot harder.

With that said, there's a kemono artist named 流れ星☆プリン / STAR PARLOR who predominantly produced romantic eromanga of human female/anthro male couples. Unfortunately, they haven't released anything since September 20, 2021.

https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/6210388
https://starparlor.booth.pm/ (all digital, the first book is, strangely, free)
https://alice-books.com/item/list/all?circle_id=4036 (physical only, all sold out)

They also produced a few of books of female anthro/male anthro couples, which are the only books I've purchased from them. Since I really like their art and am not as averse to human female/anthro mail pairings as I was over a decade ago, I may purchase some of their other books one of these days.

From a different artist, there's also this story by 旅烏 focusing on a romantic relationship between a female elf and a male orc with porcine facial features: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/65881103

As far as their furry content goes, Jyoka seemingly mostly depicts anthro females, but one 200 page book they made is mostly feral male animals transforming into anthro males and forcing themselves onto women, transforming them into anthro females, though a few stories in this collection focus on female animals doing it to men: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/44920508

If you like plus size women, benichiga-ya/stigaya depicts thin human women being transformed into fat, pig-like orc women by orc men. Most of those their stories are rape, though they did have one romance between a partially transformed human woman from a Dragon Quest game and orc man, albeit only after she was abducted and raped. Sadly, it seems all traces of their works have been excised (even storefronts) outside of manga piracy websites and hard drives such as mine, so here's where I purchased that book from: https://doujinrepublic.com/product/product_page_2000268427.html Huge shame. They often combined many of my fetishes and avoided much of what frustrates me about erotic art of plus sized women.

I'm not exclusively into kemono artists. In fact, most of what I look at is from non-Japanese artists. It's just that talking about one got me thinking about others, particularly the ones sell doujinshi.

Omg I love this pairing. It’s sad though that female_human is severely undertagged in comparison to other tags in same realm. I just wish there was an easier way to search for these pairings.

hsauq said:
People into furry content are looking mostly for anthro and feral content and these spaces are predominantly male or catering to male interests. Maybe something has changed, but I recall art of human females with anthro and feral males being much more common a decade or so ago.

I actually don't know how true this is. I'm looking at m/f human anthro using the going year by year using date: starting at 2007 and it still seems like there was way more male human/female anthro than vice versa. of the rare exceptions early on (where it was a female human/male anthro), a large portion were either popular human characters like princess_peach or the artist was a woman.

I think your conclusion is correct but your perspective is kinda wrong. the stuff is definitely usually aimed towards the male demographic (and/or drawn by males) but I think that is the reason there's so much more male human stuff. people quite often seem to want to fantasise about being with a sexy animal person more than they themselves being a sexy animal person. they either draw themselves as a human or draw generic faceless nameless human character because that's the easiest for the audience to attach to.

dba_afish said:
I actually don't know how true this is. I'm looking at m/f human anthro using the going year by year using date: starting at 2007 and it still seems like there was way more male human/female anthro than vice versa. of the rare exceptions early on (where it was a female human/male anthro), a large portion were either popular human characters like princess_peach or the artist was a woman.attach to.

As for myself, I started with catgirls and eventually expanded into anthros; that said, I don't find anything wrong with M furry on F human. The conclusion that it's because men tend to be the target audience and/or artists seems spot on to me as to why rather lopsided postings.

hsauq said:
...and these spaces are predominantly male or catering to male interests.

dba_afish said:
the stuff is definitely usually aimed towards the male demographic (and/or drawn by males) but I think that is the reason there's so much more male human stuff. people quite often seem to want to fantasise about being with a sexy animal person more than they themselves being a sexy animal person. they either draw themselves as a human or draw generic faceless nameless human character because that's the easiest for the audience to attach to.

This isn't a big surprise. It turns out that, in general, men and women prefer their porn in different ways. Men generally prefer pictures and similar visual media, while women generally prefer text stories. This isn't the case all the time, of course, but it does help explain why the porn industry tends to cater more towards men with its films and pinups while slash writers tend to be traditionally women.

dba_afish said:
I actually don't know how true this is. I'm looking at m/f human anthro using the going year by year using date: starting at 2007 and it still seems like there was way more male human/female anthro than vice versa. of the rare exceptions early on (where it was a female human/male anthro), a large portion were either popular human characters like princess_peach or the artist was a woman.

This may be true for furry websites, but I think the opposite was much more common outside of it, especially prior to 2010. I probably should have said 15 to 20 years ago.

While AF/HM art may have always been much more common in furry spaces, I recall F/M art in general being much less common back then, especially one wasn't interested in intersex/trans women.

Another thing skewing my perception is just how much more common human female/feral male used to be compared to FF/HM. The latter has caught up greatly but, even on e621, there's still about a 5:4 ratio between the two.

dba_afish said:
I think your conclusion is correct but your perspective is kinda wrong. the stuff is definitely usually aimed towards the male demographic (and/or drawn by males) but I think that is the reason there's so much more male human stuff. people quite often seem to want to fantasise about being with a sexy animal person more than they themselves being a sexy animal person. they either draw themselves as a human or draw generic faceless nameless human character because that's the easiest for the audience to attach to.

I probably should have worded my post more clearly, but this is the point I was making. The second paragraph was referring to non-furries. People attracted to anthro/ferals want to envision themselves with an anthro/feral character. People who aren't usually only want to see them when they're providing a beastly/grotesque contrast to the person they're actually attracted to.

clawstripe said:
This isn't a big surprise. It turns out that, in general, men and women prefer their porn in different ways.

Which I'm extremely grateful for when it comes to straight art of plus size or intersex/trans women. It feels like half of the artists/commssioners I follow for these are women. Unfortunately most men seem to prefer giant dommies.

clawstripe said:
This isn't a big surprise. It turns out that, in general, men and women prefer their porn in different ways. Men generally prefer pictures and similar visual media, while women generally prefer text stories. This isn't the case all the time, of course, but it does help explain why the porn industry tends to cater more towards men with its films and pinups while slash writers tend to be traditionally women.

You're pretty much bang on (if you'll pardon the pun) . Men tend to be visual and women tend to be tactile, or so I recall having heard/been taught on a few occasions. Which also explains why men don't need a lot of foreplay...just seeing a naked woman is usually enough to (pardon the pun again) get the ball rolling; while women tend to feel. But then again...foreplay is part of the fun (imo).

clawstripe said:
This isn't a big surprise. It turns out that, in general, men and women prefer their porn in different ways. Men generally prefer pictures and similar visual media, while women generally prefer text stories. This isn't the case all the time, of course, but it does help explain why the porn industry tends to cater more towards men with its films and pinups while slash writers tend to be traditionally women.

ohh, I somehow never made that observation. I consume a similar amount of both visual porn and textual erotica and I didn't really cognize the diffrence, but thinking about it, that does seem to track.

After the newest 2B vid that was posted I do have to say that I've grown to appreciate the male anthro on Human F more than I already did.

Truly a shame there's so little media compared to the opposite.
Edit: https://e621.net/posts/5961084 this one