Topic: Sally Acorn BUR

The bulk update request #11769 is pending approval.

create implication sally_acorn_(satam) (10) -> sally_acorn (6698) # duplicate of implication #69111
create implication sally_acorn_(satam_pilot) (2) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(archie) (3) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(post-sgw) (3) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(fleetway) (15) -> sally_acorn (6698)

Reason: There are several versions of Sally's character, so it makes no sense to use the same tag when they are not the same person.

14october said:
The bulk update request #11769 is pending approval.

create implication sally_acorn_(satam) (10) -> sally_acorn (6698) # duplicate of implication #69111
create implication sally_acorn_(satam_pilot) (2) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(archie) (3) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(post-sgw) (3) -> sally_acorn (6698)
create implication sally_acorn_(fleetway) (15) -> sally_acorn (6698)

Reason: Reason: There are several versions of Sally's character, so it makes no sense to use the same tag when they are not the same person.

Aliasing will make it so we'd "use the same tag when they are not the same person"... So this BUR will do the exact opposite of what your stated reason says...

the Fleetway character is entirely unrelated to the SatAM and Archie incarnation(s). the characters only happen to share a name because the small animal character(/species) Ricky was called "Sally Acorn" in SoA's series bible, which a lot of western meida pulled from prior to the series' localisation getting less... eccentric.

Can anyone change the thread by switching aliases for implications? Well, I thought aliases and implications were the same thing. But they're not.

You can always edit your BUR

the fleetway character is still entirely unrelated to the others.

also, as a note I believe most of these upvotes happened when the BUR was alias requests.