Topic: [BUR] reverse_forced_* -> forced_to_receive_*

The bulk update request #11218 is pending approval.

create alias reverse_forced_footjob (7) -> forced_to_receive_footjob (0)
create implication forced_to_receive_footjob (0) -> footjob (20776)
create implication forced_to_receive_footjob (0) -> forced (110928)
create alias reverse_forced_handjob (107) -> forced_to_receive_handjob (0)
create implication forced_to_receive_handjob (0) -> handjob (68564)
create implication forced_to_receive_handjob (0) -> forced (110928)
create alias reverse_forced_anal (66) -> forced_to_give_anal (0)
create implication forced_to_give_anal (0) -> forced (110928)
create implication forced_to_give_anal (0) -> anal (490921)
create implication forced_to_give_anal (0) -> sex (1206602)
remove implication reverse_forced_oral (1559) -> oral (346150)
remove implication reverse_forced_oral (1559) -> forced (110928)
remove implication reverse_forced_oral (1559) -> sex (1206602)
remove implication reverse_forced_rimming (35) -> forced (110928)
remove implication reverse_forced_rimming (35) -> rimming (36291)

Reason:

alias reverse_forced_oral -> forced_to_receive_oral
implicate forced_to_receive_oral -> oral
implicate forced_to_receive_oral -> forced
implicate forced_to_receive_oral -> sex
alias reverse_forced_rimming -> forced_to_receive_rimming
implicate forced_to_receive_rimming -> rimming
implicate forced_to_receive_rimming -> forced_to_receive_oral

Per discussion in topic #56996, there is an argument that the "reverse forced" tags should be more explicit about what they depict. Autocomplete also works better if all forced tags start with "forced".

Not sure that this works with anal. Receiving anal usually means being penetrated.

regsmutt said:
Not sure that this works with anal. Receiving anal usually means being penetrated.

This is true. I've changed it.

I've applied this reasoning to reverse_forced_handjob as well as per the discussion in the original thread. Note that that tag is very inconsistent, however, so cleanup will be necessary.

The bulk update request #11284 is pending approval.

mass update forced_breastfeeding -> forced_to_breastfeed
create implication forced_to_breastfeed (0) -> forced (110928)
create implication forced_to_breastfeed (0) -> breastfeeding (8406)

Reason:

mass update reverse_forced_breastfeeding -> forced_breastfeeding

Splitting this one off because it's a little unusual. As far as I can tell, this is accurate to how forced_breastfeeding and reverse_forced_breastfeeding are used. Unfortunately, the verb "breastfeed" is used interchangeably for both giving and receiving breast milk in common speech, so I don't know which phrasing is actually better.

Remaining questions:

• The wiki pages for forced_cunnilingus and forced_fellatio currently state that they should be tagged forced_oral or reverse_forced_oral depending on the scenario, but there are reverse versions of those tags in use, in addition to reverse_forced_rimming (which is part of the original BUR). Should we have separate forced-to-give/forced-to-receive tags for each subtype, or not?
• There are reverse_forced_vaginal and reverse_forced_cloacal tags, but I'm not sure what those should be renamed to.

Bumping this to propose we simply retire reverse_forced_vaginal completely, since unlike penile sex there isn't really a distinction between "give" and "receive". It should be fully synonymous with female_raping_male +vaginal. reverse_forced_cloacal still doesn't have a clear alternative, though.

...And this bump turned out to be serendipitous timing, because while I was writing this someone made a power_bottom_rape tag, which appears to be synonymous with "reverse forced" scenarios. We'll have to do something about that too.