Implicating tail_cuff → cuffs
Link to implication

Reason:

Edit: Meant tail_cuff, not tail_cuffs.

Edit 2: This should implicate shackles, not cuffs. forum #143496

Edit 3: Depreciating the cuffs tag, therefore this has been denied.

Speaking of tail_cuffs, there seems to be some miss-tagging or confusion going on with regards to tail_cuff.

It's being used both for bdsm style restraints, and for an adornment of the tail.

Random said:
Speaking of tail_cuffs, there seems to be some miss-tagging or confusion going on with regards to tail_cuff.

It's being used both for bdsm style restraints, and for an adornment of the tail.

Didn't notice that until you mentioned it. Should those be tail band? I don't pay much attention to jewelry/accessory tags so I'm not sure if there's a better tag for that.

I also didn't notice I posted tail_cuffs (instead of tail_cuff). Whoops.

parasprite said:
Didn't notice that until you mentioned it. Should those be tail band? I don't pay much attention to jewelry/accessory tags so I'm not sure if there's a better tag for that.

I also didn't notice I posted tail_cuffs (instead of tail_cuff). Whoops.

As far as I know, there's tail_cuff (for the bdsm style restraints/cuffs often with metal loops on them for restraint purposes), tail_ring (for ones that seem mainly decorative, jewelry type bands, often like a bracelet worn on a tail), and tail_band (for the inbetween, not really decorative but also doesn't have any restraint-loops on them for bdsm types). Because all three types are fairly common. Though I suspect they might need a little cleanup on use between them if its been awhile.