The tag implication #67160 barazoku -> male is pending approval.

Reason: By definition bara is exclusively male
Edited to erase any misconception

andromorph and maleherm are also masculine genders
I don't see why this tag can't apply to those two

donovan_dmc said:
andromorph and maleherm are also masculine genders
I don't see why this tag can't apply to those two

Because the genre is specifically tailored to gay men. As in no vaginas or girl parts. I'm fine if this is rejected, I just thought that it made sense.

nin10dope said:
Because the genre is specifically tailored to gay men. As in no vaginas or girl parts. I'm fine if this is rejected, I just thought that it made sense.

I find it hard to believe that there is no one that likes the genre that doesn't also like characters with the opposite or even both parts. Not to mention other sexualities also exist. I'd argue femboys are geared towards gay men but you don't see that being restricted to only masculine characters with a penis

nin10dope said:
Because the genre is specifically tailored to gay men. As in no vaginas or girl parts. I'm fine if this is rejected, I just thought that it made sense.

gay men aren't allowed to like maleherms and andromorphs?

dba_afish said:
gay men aren't allowed to like maleherms and andromorphs?

This exactly, andromorph and maleherm can be seen like trans man (not exactly but should get the idea across) and there are definitely many a gay man that would like or even prefer a trans man
I myself only like penises and not vaginas so I'd only like male, but I am absolutely not representative of all gay men and know some other people on both sides, and in the middle

Let me super simplify it: barazoku is exclusively homoerotic male anatomy. That's the genre. No vaginas, no females. I know you're both familiar with the definition by now, you've had enough wiki links sent your way. If there is a female/vagina/gynomorph/intersex/andromorph/hermaphrodite then it's not barazoku. Clear enough?

nin10dope said:
Let me super simplify it: barazoku is exclusively homoerotic male anatomy. That's the genre. No vaginas, no females. I know you're both familiar with the definition by now, you've had enough wiki links sent your way. If there is a female/vagina/gynomorph/intersex/andromorph/hermaphrodite then it's not barazoku. Clear enough?

yeah, I think we got what you were saying, but we just disagree with the premise that barazoku is a uniquely trans/intersex exclusionary brand of homoeroticism.

dba_afish said:
yeah, I think we got what you were saying, but we just disagree with the premise that barazoku is a uniquely trans/intersex exclusionary brand of homoeroticism.

Ah
I mean it probably was?
What Don said about exclusively liking penis/male is the target demographic
Definitely what those wikipedia pages all kind of blatantly said