The bulk update request #10757 is active.
create implication holding_dumbbell (177) -> dumbbell (3090)
create implication holding_dumbbell (177) -> holding_object (228370)
create implication holding_coin (120) -> coin (5451)
create implication holding_coin (120) -> holding_object (228370)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (653) -> drinking_glass (10739)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (653) -> holding_cup (9617)
create implication holding_badge (44) -> badge (3816)
create implication holding_badge (44) -> holding_object (228370)
create implication holding_marker (253) -> marker (1697)
create implication holding_marker (253) -> holding_object (228370)
Reason: Came across a couple that seem valid enough without implications attached.
Not certain if holding_drinking_glass shouldn't alias first to holding_glass_cup and that to holding_cup, like the base object tags do, but this seems like unnecessary level off granularity?
EDIT: The bulk update request #10757 (forum #443694) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator