Topic: >:I

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

TheHuskyK9 said:
Seeing that my voice isn't loud enough...
http://e621.net/tag_alias
http://e621.net/tag_implication

Is any admin going to do these yet? A few are almost 16 days old and the alias page has a page and a half full of 'pending' aliases.
post #21994

I don't know whether update fixed how implications are working, but if it has then still some things has to be implicated again. Like on_back -> lying.
on_back -lying

Updated by anonymous

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I don't know whether update fixed how implications are working, but if it has then still some things has to be implicated again. Like on_back -> lying.
on_back -lying

But yet the wiki for on_back still says it's implicated to lying. Weird...

Updated by anonymous

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
There was a lot more posts like this since at some point implications didn't add tags to older posts automatically. I think it has to do with errors in job tasks like this But maybe it's working correctly now, and some things just need to be implicated again.

That seems like the case.

Updated by anonymous

TheHuskyK9 said:
And now the tickets are piling up....

Yes they are. Only one way to solve this. Char is lead admin again. :3

Updated by anonymous

furballs_dc said:
Yes they are. Only one way to solve this. Char is lead admin again. :3

Or they get admins that are willing to be around and actually do things. Only admins that do anything on any regular basis are titaniacht, ippiki and RD, and you don't see ippiki or RD that much these days.

Updated by anonymous

Rocket_Corgi said:
Or they get admins that are willing to be around and actually do things. Only admins that do anything on any regular basis are titaniacht, ippiki and RD, and you don't see ippiki or RD that much these days.

Been noticing. =@.@=

Updated by anonymous

Rocket_Corgi said:
Or they get admins that are willing to be around and actually do things. Only admins that do anything on any regular basis are titaniacht, ippiki and RD, and you don't see ippiki or RD that much these days.

pffft. I'm always doing something to keep this tin can afloat.

Updated by anonymous

Aurali said:
pffft. I'm always doing something to keep this tin can afloat.

But site coders are in a different class then regular admins...

Updated by anonymous

Aurali said:
pffft. I'm always doing something to keep this tin can afloat.

furballs_dc said:
But site coders are in a different class then regular admins...

Pretty much this. You and Tony are in the background plugging away at the site, I don't really consider it part of your job to constantly keep track of tickets and other nonsense, you guys do the greasy work of keeping it all up and running.

Updated by anonymous

Rocket_Corgi said:
Pretty much this. You and Tony are in the background plugging away at the site, I don't really consider it part of your job to constantly keep track of tickets and other nonsense, you guys do the greasy work of keeping it all up and running.

furballs_dc said:
But site coders are in a different class then regular admins...

Engineers, quartermasters, and administration are all separate things that all handle their field.

Personally, I think e621 could use more reputable admins/mods, divided up and given more specific so things aren't following the wishywashy "whatever the first person to get to it thinks" kind of results.

More specific delegation, more direct authority over specific areas.

/offtopic

Updated by anonymous

Aurali said:
pffft. I'm always doing something to keep this tin can afloat.

You gave the tin can a V8 engine with nitrous as it sails across the water at 100+ mph

Updated by anonymous

  • 1