The tag alias #74619 brap -> fart has been rejected.

Reason: Another word for same thing.

EDIT: The tag alias brap -> fart (forum #434875) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

rupikonna said:
The tag alias #74619 brap -> fart has been rejected.

Reason: Another word for same thing.

Isn't "brap" a sound effect tag?

fifteen said:
Isn't "brap" a sound effect tag?

It's a sound effect, but we don't need a tag that's just transcribing the sfx (we have too many tags that are just copying words in the image, or variations of words, or in different languages, etc). Especially when it's heavily associated with a specific act that we already have a tag for, it's just duplicating the same information but less reliably.

watsit said:
It's a sound effect, but we don't need a tag that's just transcribing the sfx (we have too many tags that are just copying words in the image, or variations of words, or in different languages, etc). Especially when it's heavily associated with a specific act that we already have a tag for, it's just duplicating the same information but less reliably.

This, plus seems that pretty much absolutely nobody is using it as sound effect tag. It's just being used as another fart tag.

Brap -fart shows some different uses- burping and vore mostly. It's not a lot, but it's 35/108 images, which isn't insignificant. Still don't need a tag for every sound effect, but this at least needs clean up, if not a different target like onomatopoeia.

regsmutt said:
Brap -fart shows some different uses- burping and vore mostly. It's not a lot, but it's 35/108 images, which isn't insignificant. Still don't need a tag for every sound effect, but this at least needs clean up, if not a different target like onomatopoeia.

Concur on aliasing to onomatopoeia instead of fart given the findings above

spuriouszabaione said:
Concur on aliasing to onomatopoeia instead of fart given the findings above

A number of uses don't have onomatopoeia:
post #4639038 post #4684660 post #5036312 post #5185705 (and more)

maybe should be invalidated like filth was?

watsit said:
A number of uses don't have onomatopoeia:
post #4639038 post #4684660 post #5036312 post #5185705 (and more)

The majority of those tagged to brap contain sound cue texts of varying body sounds (farts, burps, etc.) These posts without onomatopoeia could be updated to -brap +fart tag instead.

spuriouszabaione said:
The majority of those tagged to brap contain sound cue texts of varying body sounds (farts, burps, etc.) These posts without onomatopoeia could be updated to -brap +fart tag instead.

Can say the same for burps. The majority contain farts, the posts without farts can remove brap so the tag can be aliased to fart. IMO, it's better to have it aliased to fart in case of someone just tagging brap; a post missing onomatopoeia is less of a problem than a post missing fart.

manitka said:
maybe should be invalidated like filth was?

Tbh this might be best. I think the fact that it gets used for other stuff >30% of the time is bit too high for a clean alias.

The bulk update request #10045 is active.

change category brap (0) -> invalid

Reason: another alternative option, since this sound effect could be used in multiple contexts, and not all "brap" posts are onomatopoeia

EDIT: The bulk update request #10045 (forum #434923) has been approved by @furrypickle.

rupikonna said:
Reason: Another word for same thing.

While "brap" is most commonly associated with fart, posts like post #2120062, post #2504546, and post #3021627 just shows that it isn't always the case.

The tag alias brap -> fart (forum #434875) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

I went through and did a quick sort into fart or burping etc as needed. It looks like it used to be used mainly for burping, and then the tag became taken over for farting... which is interesting mostly to see how trends sometimes change. It should be safe to invalidate now though.

The bulk update request #10045 (forum #434923) has been approved by @furrypickle.