Aliasing Average_breasts -> Breasts.

Reason: Since when is being average noteworthy?

Actually I think it has value if the system of having a tag for each breast-size category was sorted back out into something more functional. In that case just "breasts" would include all sizes from itty bitties up to hyper. So a separate tag for average/normal-sized breasts then makes sense for sorting, searching, browsing etc. However last I looked it seemed half the tags implicated each other in a long implication train that made it all vaguely useless (hyper_breasts ---> huge_breasts ---> big_breasts ---> breasts ). It's a mess, and not very functional. Not to mention I don't think there's a very clear definition of where each begins and ends between big, huge and hyper. That's probably the whole problem. I actually read a whole discussion on it from awhile back and it looked like not even cup sizes were an accurate measurement for breast sizes. They needed something more objective to compare it to, like their head size. It would be useful though, if we had more than one comparison point especially as you get to the middle ranges which are less than a head-size but...what else differentiates them?

Basically "average_breasts" is part of a tag system mess that either needs sorted out or to finally give up the ghost. It's a great idea to differentiate breasts by size. Especially since everyone has a preference range and wants to be able to find it easily. The how-to-objectively-define-breast-size part seems to be where things got mixed up. So currently the system isn't as useful as it should be. Just to point out what else relates to this discussion, we currently have:

• hyper_breasts (~)
• macro_breasts (are these mistags for hyper_breasts?)
• huge_breasts (~)
• big_breasts (~)
• average_breasts
• small_breasts
• breasts (~)

The (~) is to show where the implication train runs through it.

One more note: the current wiki definition for average_breasts is "normal sized breasts that appear natural on their owner with no enhancements, implants, etc" which makes it sound more the natural_breasts tag, which is unnecessarily confusing the concepts of "natural" with "size". There's a reason natural_breasts is a separate tag from breast size. Also, "normal sized" is not an objective size measurement to tag by, since it depends on what you're used to. It needs an objective reference point just to keep everyone in the same size range, not based on the average of their social circle whatever that might be.

Let's keep this tag for now and perhaps clean it up? It implicates breasts so I think we should make use of it before nuking it

Rainbow_Dash said:
Let's keep this tag for now and perhaps clean it up? It implicates breasts so I think we should make use of it before nuking it

If we're going to keep this tag (which I don't think we should), then we really need to define what constitutes 'average' breasts, because every single person is going to have a different mental gauge by which they judge breast size. Mine would be B's, but another person might consider C's average.

Approved.