The tag alias #74594 schrodinger's_pantsu -> invalid_tag is pending approval.

Reason: A tag for when you don't see panties but also don't see an absence of panties. Very silly. Thought about aliasing it to skimpy but that doesn't apply to all of them.

regsmutt said:
The tag alias #74594 schrodinger's_pantsu -> invalid_tag is pending approval.

Reason: A tag for when you don't see panties but also don't see an absence of panties. Very silly. Thought about aliasing it to skimpy but that doesn't apply to all of them.

I cannot think of a better extant tag for the general kind of post this tends to have and bring to mind. Maybe it should be replaced with something less silly, rather than invalidating it entirely.

peskeon said:
I cannot think of a better extant tag for the general kind of post this tends to have and bring to mind.

What kind of post is it intended to indicate? From the looks of posts with the tag, it seems to just mean you can't see if there's panties or not. Not being able to tell if something is there or not doesn't warrant a tag IMO, it just means you can't see it from the given perspective and type of clothing. Shrodinger's tail, Shrodinger's underwear, Shrodinger's nipples, Shrodinger's anus...

peskeon said:
I cannot think of a better extant tag for the general kind of post this tends to have and bring to mind. Maybe it should be replaced with something less silly, rather than invalidating it entirely.

This is what sets are for. Especially considering that this tag is populated by one guy with seemingly arbitrary criteria.

Shouldn't you set the tag category to invalid instead of aliasing to invalid_tag? At least, then, the tagger is made aware of what tag was the invalid one.

fifteen said:
Shouldn't you set the tag category to invalid instead of aliasing to invalid_tag? At least, then, the tagger is made aware of what tag was the invalid one.

There's no possible tag it can be replaced with, and I don't think anyone's gonna be tagging/using it after it gets aliased away