Topic: muscular_female

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Found another broken implication. I wanted to make a tag implication: muscular_female -> muscles and it said that it's already implied. But I went to the wiki of muscular_female and it doesn't say that it implies muscles but only female. On top of that, I found a lot of images that have the muscular_female tag but not the muscles tag. What's up?

Updated by Rainbow Dash

Char

Former Staff

That's because muscular_female is an implication that's been suggested but is currently still waiting approval. A search of the implication page shows this: http://e621.net/tag_implication?query=muscular_female&user=&approved=all&order=tag Any time you see an alias or implication in orange, it means it hasn't yet been approved.

Unfortunately, the process for making new aliases and implications is kind of broken at the moment because it keeps getting stuck pretty often, so new aliases and implications don't go through until it's restarted again. Varka and the dev team are looking into it.

Updated by anonymous

Char said:
That's because muscular_female is an implication that's been suggested but is currently still waiting approval. A search of the implication page shows this: http://e621.net/tag_implication?query=muscular_female&user=&approved=all&order=tag Any time you see an alias or implication in orange, it means it hasn't yet been approved.

Unfortunately, the process for making new aliases and implications is kind of broken at the moment because it keeps getting stuck pretty often, so new aliases and implications don't go through until it's restarted again. Varka and the dev team are looking into it.

May I ask who or what broke it this time?

Updated by anonymous

Falord said:
May I ask who or what broke it this time?

The reason is here, in your heart... or in the new setup Varka did *shrug*

Updated by anonymous

  • 1