Implicating facesitting -> cunnilingus.

Reason: According to wiki page, facesitting involves cunnilingus.

post #296192
post #300288
post #301776

And the point is that according to the wiki they should either also be tagged with cunnilingus, or they shouldn't be tagged as facesitting.

Hammie said:
And the point is that according to the wiki they should either also be tagged with cunnilingus, or they shouldn't be tagged as facesitting.

Why not? Their faces are being sat on. What else would we call it? Plus, you can't always see cunnilingus happening.

Facesitting also applies to anilingus.

Hammie said:
And the point is that according to the wiki they should either also be tagged with cunnilingus, or they shouldn't be tagged as facesitting.

I think in this case it would be a better course of action to change the wiki to better match the tag, instead of forcing the tag to match the wiki.

Wiki needs to be fix'd. If we agree on this suggestion, I'll fix it immediately

EDIT: Damn it, NotMeNotYou. You beat me to it XD

Just because it's defined as also involving cunnilingus doesn't mean that you're going to see it in the image. Bad implication, I vote no.

NotMeNotYou said:
I think in this case it would be a better course of action to change the wiki to better match the tag, instead of forcing the tag to match the wiki.

Fair enough, perhaps we should simply change it to be more in line with the Wikipedia definition then?
So long as the issue of the tags not matching the wiki gets resolved one way or the other, I don't much care which way it gets fixed.

It's funny. Implication was approved and now gay pictures with facesitting tag also got vaginal and cunnilingus tags. And the reason behind this decision was wiki-page from the user, who has negative record for gender specific wiki edits.

mlp said:
It's funny. Implication was approved and now gay pictures with facesitting tag also got vaginal and cunnilingus tags. And the reason behind this decision was wiki-page from the user, who has negative record for gender specific wiki edits.

Who even accepted this?

Seven_Twenty said:
Who even accepted this?

Rainbow_Dash

mlp said:
It's funny. Implication was approved and now gay pictures with facesitting tag also got vaginal and cunnilingus tags. And the reason behind this decision was wiki-page from the user, who has negative record for gender specific wiki edits.

Damn it, I had a feeling this would happen

Now gay facesitting images are tagged with vagina and cunnilingus

http://e621.net/post/show/299089

Removed. This was a bad idea.

I thought we had decided to change the wiki instead of doing the implication :P

Ah well, sorry about that.

Ooops, my bad; it kinda got mixed in with a larger list of aliases, thanks aura for fixing it

Rainbow_Dash said:
Ooops, my bad; it kinda got mixed in with a larger list of aliases, thanks aura for fixing it

Awww, who can stay mad at that face.