post #5048997 I'm not familiar with this type of cloaca. What I see is a penis with an orifice that could connect to the rectum, and maybe the vagina too

dinbyy said:
post #5048997 I'm not familiar with this type of cloaca. What I see is a penis with an orifice that could connect to the rectum, and maybe the vagina too

seems about right through cloacal_penis seems to be lacking a implication to cloaca, the specific shape would fall under triangular_cloaca. As long as it is clearly visible that there is no separate anus, cloaca may apply.

ryu_deacon said:
seems about right through cloacal_penis seems to be lacking a implication to cloaca, the specific shape would fall under triangular_cloaca. As long as it is clearly visible that there is no separate anus, cloaca may apply.

Might be because of this line in the wiki:

cloacal_penis said:
If the creature in question is an accurately depicted feral animal that'd normally have a cloaca -- and it has an anatomically correct penis -- then this may be tagged even if the cloaca itself is obscured from the view.

snpthecat said:
Might be because of this line in the wiki:

cloacal_penis said:
If the creature in question is an accurately depicted feral animal that'd normally have a cloaca -- and it has an anatomically correct penis -- then this may be tagged even if the cloaca itself is obscured from the view.

Ya I noticed that, I am debating wether to remove that as it is in opposition to twys.