Didnt see anything on this subject, so I was wondering do flippers count as legs/limbs? Are these in fact taurs?

If not how could these be tagged that is distinguishable from stereotypical mermaid style merfolk?

post #3874364 post #2871356 post #2472451 post #10105
some of these are presently tagged as taur however its my understanding that merfolk are not tagged as taur if Im not mistaken?

Also what of merfolk that dont have flippers but have lower bodies that exhibit a more complete specimen(torso/body) of a derivative species rather than just a tail or partial(ex: tentacles) of a species?

post #1399714 post #1558803

ryu_deacon said:
Didnt see anything on this subject, so I was wondering do flippers count as legs/limbs? Are these in fact taurs?

If not how could these be tagged that is distinguishable from stereotypical mermaid style merfolk?

post #3874364 post #2871356 post #2472451 post #10105
some of these are presently tagged as taur however its my understanding that merfolk are not tagged as taur if Im not mistaken?

Also what of merfolk that dont have flippers but have lower bodies that exhibit a more complete specimen(torso/body) of a derivative species rather than just a tail or partial(ex: tentacles) of a species?

post #1399714 post #1558803

Draconcopode has similar issues.

alphamule said:
Draconcopode has similar issues.

to a lesser extent yes but what would these be considered to you?

still seeking an answer to this..

in my opinion, if the human/anthro upper body replaces the neck/head of the feral it's taur, regardless of method of locomotion.

if it's a roughly even split, human/anthro upper half on top of feral lower half it's not.