Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: matryoshka_sex -> recursive_penetration

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

spe said:
Wait, so what's the difference between matryoshka_sex and in_utero_penetration? Based on their wikis, they sound like the same tag.

Funnily, the wiki for in_utero_penetration includes the stomach, but matroyshka_sex doesn't, even though the former has the literal latin word for "womb" in its name and the latter doesn't. I'd probably just alias in_utero_penetration and turducken_position to matroyshka, if people wanna keep the funnier name.

pankino2002 said:
Funnily, the wiki for in_utero_penetration includes the stomach, but matroyshka_sex doesn't, even though the former has the literal latin word for "womb" in its name and the latter doesn't. I'd probably just alias in_utero_penetration and turducken_position to matroyshka, if people wanna keep the funnier name.

Honestly, yeah, consolidating them all into matryoshka_sex or recursive_penetration seems like it would be best. Debloat things a bit, and use tags like cervical_penetration or penis_in_stomach to indicate *where* it's happening...

spe said:
Wait, so what's the difference between matryoshka_sex and in_utero_penetration? Based on their wikis, they sound like the same tag.

I'd imagine the difference is that in_utero_penetration would apply to cases of one womb-occupant penetrating another womb-occupant, while matryoshka_sex necessitates that the penetration first be occurring to whoever's womb it is (thus, theoretically, requiring that the penetrator be external to the womb).

  • 1