Most aspect ratio tags appear to have been nuked, but not invalidated.

arkham_horror said:
Most aspect ratio tags appear to have been nuked, but not invalidated.

Aspect ratios without posts are not meant to be used, and Donovan DMC regularly(?) clears them out. Being mistaken as being nuked is probably a good reason to move all the ratio tags out of meta and into general

arkham_horror said:
Most aspect ratio tags appear to have been nuked, but not invalidated.

You can use ratio: https://e621.net/help/cheatsheet#imagesize

arrow189 said:
You can use ratio: https://e621.net/help/cheatsheet#imagesize

This is only accurate up to two decimal places (not nearly precise enough to really be useful, we need about 10 to be 100% accurate), it being inaccurate is the only reason we still have any aspect ratio tags

snpthecat said:
Aspect ratios without posts are not meant to be used, and Donovan DMC regularly(?) clears them out. Being mistaken as being nuked is probably a good reason to move all the ratio tags out of meta and into general

How can they have posts if the posts are removed? 🤔 That's a cyclical problem.

I don't understand the motivations of tagging and tag changes sometimes and it's frustrating. I keep noticing little issues like redundant tags but it feels like a waste to draw attention to them.
(Edit: The cubpocalypse was pretty understandable and straightforward. I'm not bitching about that.)

donovan_dmc said:
This is only accurate up to two decimal places

I'm genuinely curious why only two.