Topic: Should we keep the twin_brothers/sisters tags? (BUR inside)

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Strikerman

Janitor

I'm fine with the tags. In any kind of post with multiple family members (e.g. an older sibling with their younger twin siblings), having just twins tagged wouldn't make it clear what kind of twins are present in the post.

theghost123

Member

The bulk update request #7554 is pending approval.

create alias twin_brother (0) -> twin_brother_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brother_(lore) (0) -> twins_(lore) (9161)
create implication twin_brother_(lore) (0) -> brother_(lore) (31786)
create alias twin_brothers (45) -> twin_brothers_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brothers_(lore) (0) -> twin_brother_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brothers_(lore) (0) -> brothers_(lore) (12848)
create alias twin_sister (0) -> twin_sister_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_sister_(lore) (0) -> twins_(lore) (9161)
create implication twin_sister_(lore) (0) -> sister_(lore) (31770)
create alias twin_sisters (27) -> twin_sisters_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_sisters_(lore) (0) -> twin_sister_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_sisters_(lore) (0) -> sisters_(lore) (12791)
create alias twin_brother_and_sister (1) -> twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) (0)
create alias twin_sister_and_brother (0) -> twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) (0) -> twin_brother_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) (0) -> twin_sister_(lore) (0)
create implication twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) (0) -> brother_and_sister_(lore) (17450)

Reason: Brothers, sisters, and twins are already lore tags.

lore # missing

category twin_brother_(lore) -> lore # missing
category twin_brothers_(lore) -> lore # missing
category twin_sister_(lore) -> lore # missing
category twin_sisters_(lore) -> lore # missing
category twin_brother_and_sister_(lore) -> lore # missing

Updated

  • 1