The bulk update request #6810 has been rejected.

create alias speed_art (1) -> speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias speedart (31) -> speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias speed_painting (3) -> speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias speedpainting (34) -> speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias speedpaint (218) -> speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0)
change category speedpaint_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: Edited to disambiguate?

(Actually, it's a little hard to tell which posts mean there's a speedpaint video and which ones mean it was a speed painting, because they're used interchangeably... Should this be disambiguated instead?)

EDIT: The bulk update request #6810 (forum #392961) has been rejected by @Nimphia.

Speedpaint kinda has two meanings, either a painting that was done quickly (what the wiki page says) or a timelapse of the art process (what you seem to be implying, I think?)

Edit: either you ninja edited or I just totally spaced that last paragraph lol. Yeah perhaps better to disambiguate. For images that have a speedpaint video of the process, we could call that timelapse_at_source or something.

cloudpie said:
Speedpaint kinda has two meanings, either a painting that was done quickly (what the wiki page says) or a timelapse of the art process (what you seem to be implying, I think?)

Edit: either you ninja edited or I just totally spaced that last paragraph lol. Yeah perhaps better to disambiguate. For images that have a speedpaint video of the process, we could call that timelapse_at_source or something.

Yeah, I ninja'd. I'm gonna edit the original request to disambiguate? Both specific tags would be meta, could do speed_painting_(artwork) and timelapse_at_source/speedpaint_at_source?

"Speedpainting" doesn't need to be a tag. It's solely about the time and effort the artist put into making the image, where different artists have different opinions for what counts for speedpainting (maybe basing it relative to their general time to complete an image, which can change as they learn to work faster or take more time to flesh out pieces in general), and says nothing about the final result (its visual elements or quality). It's like having a tag made_in_a_few_hours or low_effort. speed_art, speedart, speed_painting, and speedpainting should all be aliased to invalid_tag.

I don't think I've ever heard of a timelapse being called a speedpaint, so I don't think there's a real issue with ambiguity.

nimphia said:
Yeah, I ninja'd. I'm gonna edit the original request to disambiguate? Both specific tags would be meta, could do speed_painting_(artwork) and timelapse_at_source/speedpaint_at_source?

I'd prefer timelapse_at_source personally since "speedpaint" has these two meanings, it's just more clear

And I agree with Watsit that we don't really need a tag for quick paintings

watsit said:
I don't think I've ever heard of a timelapse being called a speedpaint, so I don't think there's a real issue with ambiguity.

Speedpaint is a very widely used term for an art timelapse on youtube and has been since like 2010

watsit said:
"Speedpainting" doesn't need to be a tag. It's solely about the time and effort the artist put into making the image, where different artists have different opinions for what counts for speedpainting (maybe basing it relative to their general time to complete an image, which can change as they learn to work faster or take more time to flesh out pieces in general), and says nothing about the final result (its visual elements or quality). It's like having a tag made_in_a_few_hours or low_effort. speed_art, speedart, speed_painting, and speedpainting should all be aliased to invalid_tag.

I don't think I've ever heard of a timelapse being called a speedpaint, so I don't think there's a real issue with ambiguity.

I'm not against not having a tag for the concept of speed painting as in the time spent, but Cloudpie is right, "speedpaint" is a common term for art timelapses on YouTube. It's the definition I first thought of.

Some of the posts tagged speedpaint:

• post #3939796 - Is a timelapse gif
• post #3447064 - Is a timelapse video
• post #2752302 - Is a timelapse video
• post #2499737 - Links to a speedpaint in the description
• post #2158589 - "Watch on YouTube"
• post #1806538 - Links to a speedpaint in the description

I'm gonna reject the original BUR though so we can properly figure out what to do with these tags. I'm fine with invalidating and instead using timelapse_at_source for that type of speedpaint. Maybe timelapse_available or art_timelapse or something to cover things like in-description links and gifs/webms?

The bulk update request #6810 (forum #392961) has been rejected by @Nimphia.

nimphia said:
I'm not against not having a tag for the concept of speed painting as in the time spent, but Cloudpie is right, "speedpaint" is a common term for art timelapses on YouTube. It's the definition I first thought of.

Some of the posts tagged speedpaint:

• post #3939796 - Is a timelapse gif
• post #3447064 - Is a timelapse video
• post #2752302 - Is a timelapse video
• post #2499737 - Links to a speedpaint in the description
• post #2158589 - "Watch on YouTube"
• post #1806538 - Links to a speedpaint in the description

I'm gonna reject the original BUR though so we can properly figure out what to do with these tags. I'm fine with invalidating and instead using timelapse_at_source for that type of speedpaint. Maybe timelapse_available or art_timelapse or something to cover things like in-description links and gifs/webms?

What if art_timelapse was for timelapses hosted here as gifs/webms, and timelapse_at_source for when there's a linked one (wouldn't it be appropriate to put linked timelapses in the source field in addition to the description?)

Edit: related tags I found: time_lapse, art_progression