Implicating double_vaginal → vaginal_penetration
Link to implication

Reason:

Double_anal currently implies anal_penetration, so double_vaginal should be handled this way to be consistent.

Related implications:

• double_vaginal -> vaginal_penetration (OP approved)
• double_vaginal -> double_penetration (denied)
• triple_anal -> anal_penetration (approved), triple_penetration (denied)
• triple_vaginal -> vaginal_penetration (approved), triple_penetration (denied)
• all_three_filled -> triple_penetration (pending) (possibly vaginal/anal penetration as well, but it could be fellatio or a tentacle, technically speaking). (Edit: Currently implies anal, vaginal, oral)

Misc cleanup:

Not entirely necessary, but I try to clean things like this up when possible.

• Unimplicate double_anal -/> anal (approved)
• It already implies anal_penetration, which in turn implies anal
• Unimplicate double_vaginal -> vaginal (approved)
• See above.

My only concern is posts with triple_penetration (2 anal, 1 vaginal) also being tagged double_penetration, which is sort of excessive. Unimplicating them would mean that double_anal (or double_vaginal) wouldn't automatically get tagged with double_penetration which is probably worse practicality-wise.

I thought that there was a consensus on the notion that in order for triple_penetration to occur, there must be penetration in 3 separate orifices.

That being said, implicating triple_penetration to double_penetration would always work because one of the criteria for triple_penetration to occur would be double_penetration.

quote from: triple_penetration

"A character who is being penetrated by a combination of 3 routes (oral, vaginal, or anal) all at the same time."

So, given the current wiki, any combination of triple_penetration without oral, vaginal & anal occurring simultaneously is an incorrect use of the tag, and to tag 2 anal, 1 vaginal, would be double_anal double_penetration vaginal, not triple_penetration.

So either we need a wiki clean up or an established definition of the term triple_penetration.

That definition was moved into all_three_filled in forum #143920, I never got around to rewriting that bit except for editing out the gender-specific bits.

Here's the previous definition from 2011:

Images or animations depicting a female character who is being penetrated orally, vaginally, and anally, all at the same time.

It's a pretty simple rewrite so I'll do that now before I forget.

The following changes were made:

• Implication: double_vaginal -> vaginal_penetration (OP approved)
• Implication: triple_anal -> anal_penetration (approved)
• Implication: triple_vaginal -> vaginal_penetration (approved)
• Implication: triple_penetration -> penetration (approved)
• Implication: double_anal -/> anal (deleted) - Redundant
• Implication: double_vaginal -/> vaginal (deleted) - Redundant

I also made this change:

• Implication: double_anal -/> double_penetration (deleted)

Because there are many cases where a character can have double anal penetration, but also be penetrated in another orifice, which should be tagged with triple_penetration instead.