Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating koopa → turtle
Link to implication
Yoshis are implicated to dinosaurs, so Koopas should be implicated to turtles.
You may want to do this with koopa_troopa, koopalings, and bowser, as well, if they're not already.
Updated by user 59725
That last one would make the 20 pictures of Meowser be tagged turtle. post #409472
EDIT: Apparently he already gets tagged koopa, so I guess calling him a turtle makes sense too.
Updated by anonymous
Afterglow said:
Yoshis are implicated to dinosaurs, so Koopas should be implicated to turtles.You may want to do this with koopa_troopa, koopalings, and bowser, as well, if they're not already.
Characters aren't supposed to get implicated to a species. Yoshis are iffy, since it's actually the name of a species (The one that considers Mario his best friend should get a different tag), but the Koopalings and Bowser should now be implicated, because it could be a character of another species dressed up as them, or them in the appearance as another species.
Updated by anonymous
A previous discussion seems to think that it shouldn't be implicated and I agree with that. The yoshi one should be removed IMO.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Characters aren't supposed to get implicated to a species. Yoshis are iffy, since it's actually the name of a species (The one that considers Mario his best friend should get a different tag), but the Koopalings and Bowser should now be implicated, because it could be a character of another species dressed up as them, or them in the appearance as another species.
Koopas aren't a character, but a species. A fictional species, but a species nonetheless. They're a type of turtle.
We have plenty of Pokémon species tied to real-life species tags.
Updated by anonymous
Afterglow said:
Koopas aren't a character, but a species. A fictional species, but a species nonetheless. They're a type of turtle.We have plenty of Pokémon species tied to real-life species tags.
We don't actually implicate pokemon to species anymore. I suspect that a lot of these fictional species implications will start disappearing as well.
Updated by anonymous
I agree that implications to other species should be removed. And, in this case, it should remain unimplicated.
Updated by anonymous
