The bulk update request #5794 is active.

create implication sonic_superstars (141) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (117973)
create implication fang_the_hunter (431) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (117973)
create implication trip_the_sungazer (217) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (117973)
create implication trip_(dragon_form) (9) -> trip_the_sungazer (217)
create implication bean_the_dynamite (66) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (117973)
create implication bark_the_polar_bear (95) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (117973)

Reason: Giving a tag implication to the game and characters. Noticed that Fang's gang didn't had implications either so I added them here as a bonus.

*Edit: Added implication for Trip's dragon form's tag as well

EDIT: The bulk update request #5794 (forum #380787) has been approved by @slyroon.

mcdonaldschicken15 said:
create implication trip_the_sungazer (35) -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) (94444)
create implication trip_the_sungazer (35) -> sonic_superstars (41)

One of these is unnecessary. If the character implies sonic_superstars, then sonic_superstars will imply sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) so the character doesn't need to. But these days, it's preferred to not have characters imply specific games in a series, since they can appear in other games in the series later on, so they probably should imply .sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) and not sonic_superstars.

watsit said:
One of these is unnecessary. If the character implies sonic_superstars, then sonic_superstars will imply sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) so the character doesn't need to. But these days, it's preferred to not have characters imply specific games in a series, since they can appear in other games in the series later on, so they probably should imply .sonic_the_hedgehog_(series) and not sonic_superstars.

There

The bulk update request #5794 (forum #380787) has been approved by @slyroon.