In my opinion, it should simply just be tagged for posts that involve the viewer directly (i.e. post #3908196, which has a character humping "your pillows" and sniffing "your underwear").
The fact that it's invalid means it's not tagged, which means I can't blacklist it. And, as someone who is fiercely aegosexual to the point where anything involving myself is an immediate turn-off, that's a bit of a problem.

There's ych_(character) for when a character is specifically labelled as "you" or "ych"

post #4368873 post #4400984 post #4347717 post #4265482

The example you gave isn't exactly a fit with that though, since no character is actually displayed.

if there was a tag for the situation you're describing it almost certainly would not be called you, that's such a weird and vague tagname and would definitely be mistagged all over the place.

juansanchez said:
if there was a tag for the situation you're describing it almost certainly would not be called you, that's such a weird and vague tagname and would definitely be mistagged all over the place.

fair enough, i just want some way to blacklist it.

Hi, just throwing in my two cents here. There are tags dedicated toward this kind of content, revolving around the term viewer , along with some tags involving fourth wall breaks . Unfortunately, these tags seem to be severely underpopulated, so maybe you'll have to tag them when you see them. Maybe post a request for implications and aliases for the few that are already tagged?

hypabeast_ad said:
fair enough, i just want some way to blacklist it.

Try to search for viewer tags like so *_viewer and then blacklist all of then naually.