I don't want to go through the pain of writing an implication request for each individual tag. But there was an art on this site that was tagged with prey and pred tags and the description even had a story about vore, but there was no vore tag on the art.

I'm not a huge fan of vore and a bit less of a fan when it slips through the blacklist. Just asking to make some of the pred and prey tags implicate vore.

pls don't get mad at me.

Also first time using the forum.

proffessor_funbags said:
I don't want to go through the pain of writing an implication request for each individual tag. But there was an art on this site that was tagged with prey and pred tags and the description even had a story about vore, but there was no vore tag on the art.

I'm not a huge fan of vore and a bit less of a fan when it slips through the blacklist. Just asking to make some of the pred and prey tags implicate vore.

pls don't get mad at me.

Also first time using the forum.

You can have a predator and prey in the same scene without it being about vore, no? And if the image doesn't contain vore (only the description), then it shouldn't be tagged.

Though on reading the wiki, it does seem to be used in conjunction with vore.

Temporary fix for now is just to blacklist
*_prey
*_pred

proffessor_funbags said:
I don't want to go through the pain of writing an implication request for each individual tag. But there was an art on this site that was tagged with prey and pred tags and the description even had a story about vore, but there was no vore tag on the art.

I'm not a huge fan of vore and a bit less of a fan when it slips through the blacklist. Just asking to make some of the pred and prey tags implicate vore.

Things that are only mentioned in the description aren't tagged, just what's visible in the image. The vore tag is for depictions of vore in the image (the act, i.e. swallowing/ingesting or digesting), and pred/prey activity can occur without vore, so an implication would cause some mistags. There is the imminent_vore tag for images where there's visible indication that vore is about to happen, which you can blacklist to help to exclude more vore-related posts (make sure it's on a separate line in your blacklist, or else it may not work as desired).

snpthecat said:
You can have a predator and prey in the same scene without it being about vore, no?

just to confirm, "pred" and "prey" =/= predator and prey

the way we use the terms pred and prey for tagging are specifically related to vore situations*. although, I believe that the *_pred and *_prey tags would be valid in imminent_vore posts, so they wouldn't necessarily need the vore tag.

_{*usually; with predator/prey being one of the few exceptions. "pred", at least, is always a vore thing.}

proffessor_funbags said:
I don't want to go through the pain of writing an implication request for each individual tag. But there was an art on this site that was tagged with prey and pred tags and the description even had a story about vore, but there was no vore tag on the art.

I'm not a huge fan of vore and a bit less of a fan when it slips through the blacklist. Just asking to make some of the pred and prey tags implicate vore.

pls don't get mad at me.

Also first time using the forum.

Other people have said it, but this is a bad idea because of imminent_vore posts (which should be on your blacklist as well, probably) Just add "vore" to appropriate posts that slip through when you catch them, it'll only take a second, others will be thankful.

snpthecat said:
You can have a predator and prey in the same scene without it being about vore, no? And if the image doesn't contain vore (only the description), then it shouldn't be tagged.

Yes, but you're not quite understanding what I mean. I am aware there is a predator/prey tag (which would mean fox/bunny would fall under that tag) and I don't want everything that is tagged that to be in there.

I'm not saying to make every tag with pred or prey in it a vore implication, I'm just saying that some tags should either implicate or alias it. The post that I'm refering to had female pred and human prey tagged but not vore tagged. Along with pokemon pred and pokemon prey tagged. What I want is for tags describing the pred or prey to implicate vore or imminent vore at least.

proffessor_funbags said:
Yes, but you're not quite understanding what I mean. I am aware there is a predator/prey tag (which would mean fox/bunny would fall under that tag) and I don't want everything that is tagged that to be in there.

I'm not saying to make every tag with pred or prey in it a vore implication, I'm just saying that some tags should either implicate or alias it. The post that I'm refering to had female pred and human prey tagged but not vore tagged. Along with pokemon pred and pokemon prey tagged. What I want is for tags describing the pred or prey to implicate vore or imminent vore at least.

imminent vore and vore are not to be tagged for the same situation, since one is for before the voring occurs and one is for during the process of consumption. Prey and Pred tags can be applicable for both, so they can't implicate either.

If the image is imminent vore with pred and prey tags, it shouldn't imply vore, since no one is being actively consumed. (&vice versa)
Just blacklist imminent vore, vore and after vore and move on.

proffessor_funbags said:
What I want is for tags describing the pred or prey to implicate vore or imminent vore at least.

we can't have a tag imply tags for mutually exclusive situations, that'd break everything.

...but also like, the post in question already had imminent_vore applied from initial upload. so the problem here is that you didn't have imminent_vore blacklisted, not that the post lacked the proper vore-related tags.

sipothac said:
we can't have a tag imply tags for mutually exclusive situations, that'd break everything.

...but also like, the post in question already had imminent_vore applied from initial upload. so the problem here is that you didn't have imminent_vore blacklisted, not that the post lacked the proper vore-related tags.

I see. So being in the mouth isn't vore??
Thanks for correcting me.