Every time I get on here to look up vore I run into images that are, VERY objectively implied_digestion. Ether through Dialogue or the pred's belly getting visibly smaller, burping up cloths or accessories that couldn't have possibly just slid off, Just many, MANY little different things that directly imply digestion but defy any other way to tag them in a way that makes them avoidable to people uncomfortable with it without blocking out huge swaths of stuff they actually want to see.
You can't really tag digestion on images like this where it's not outright stated, same with fatal_vore. Sometimes Imminent_digestion doesn't fit cus it's implied it happened or is happening.
Stuff like this is deeply uncomfortable for many people into vore and it's really frustrating when I have to borderline misstag things to help people avoid this shit because the one tag that would fix this issue is labeled as invalid for some reason. It's no more invalid than implied_rape or implied_incest which are implied tags that are in use and not labled as invalid. I thought implied_death was also valid but it's apparently not and that's equally as stupid if not more so.

Reading the wiki for digestion it seems like you can just use that tag even when the digestion is merely implied.

"Digestion plays a major role in vore content, particularly oral vore. It may be implied or explicitly shown by sequence, comic or in animation, internally or externally. Note that a character simply being in another's stomach isn't enough to be tagged digestion, unless it has occurred to other contents of the stomach, or strongly implied to be occurring by pooling stomach acid, contractions of the stomach, rumbling stomach, or even dialogue."

Most of the implied_* tags should be revalidated. implied_masturbation is a particular bugbear of mine.

wat8548 said:
Most of the implied_* tags should be revalidated. implied_masturbation is a particular bugbear of mine.

Wholeheartedly agree. Maybe they could be re-aliased to their lore counterpart if they turn out to be too subjective, but there are scenarios where the base tag (rape, vore, etc) wouldn't work for a post, but implied_* would.

pollexmessier said:
Every time I get on here to look up vore I run into images that are, VERY objectively implied_digestion. Ether through Dialogue or the pred's belly getting visibly smaller, burping up cloths or accessories that couldn't have possibly just slid off, Just many, MANY little different things that directly imply digestion but defy any other way to tag them in a way that makes them avoidable to people uncomfortable with it without blocking out huge swaths of stuff they actually want to see.
You can't really tag digestion on images like this where it's not outright stated, same with fatal_vore. Sometimes Imminent_digestion doesn't fit cus it's implied it happened or is happening.
Stuff like this is deeply uncomfortable for many people into vore and it's really frustrating when I have to borderline misstag things to help people avoid this shit because the one tag that would fix this issue is labeled as invalid for some reason. It's no more invalid than implied_rape or implied_incest which are implied tags that are in use and not labled as invalid. I thought implied_death was also valid but it's apparently not and that's equally as stupid if not more so.

imminent_digestion sometimes fills the gaps

maplebytes said:
imminent_digestion sometimes fills the gaps

"Sometimes" yeah that ain't gonna work.