Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: werecreature -> were

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Why would I reduce it to Were when the word were has more meanings than one.
When I can simply use werecreature and KNOW exactly what that means?

m3g4p0n1 said:
If I'm not mistaken, one tag aliases carry over the subsequent aliases automatically.
Manually unaliasing and aliasing is only needed for BURs.

Oh true, forgot about that. Though it'll have to be a new forum post

m3g4p0n1 said:
I think werecreature sounds better than were.

I don't care if it is were or werecreature.
It is like the vtuber debate, can we please not make everything ten times more complicated and be done with it?

closetpossum said:
Why would I reduce it to Were when the word were has more meanings than one.
When I can simply use werecreature and KNOW exactly what that means?

"Were" is not a noun, it carries no meaning whatsoever. It would be like saying "is" is bad because it supposedly carries any meaning when it does not.

m3g4p0n1 said:
I think werecreature sounds better than were.

Agreed, and I'm under the impression that it's a common term anyway, and "werecreature" literally means "man-creature".

Watsit

Privileged

m3g4p0n1 said:
I think werecreature sounds better than were.

I concur. They should be aliased together, but this should be reversed in my opinion.

  • 1