Implicating infested_kerrigan → sarah_kerrigan
Link to implication

Reason:

Same character in a different form.

See also forum #143721

parasprite said:
Implicating infested_kerrigan → sarah_kerrigan
Link to implication

Reason:

Same character in a different form.

See also forum #143721

Oh, right, she did have a Zerg name.

Is there a difference between the infested_kerrigan tag and the queen_of_blades tag?

They're both character tags, and seem to both be referring to sarah kerrigan in her zerg form. Which makes me think infested_kerrigan would be better off aliased to --> queen_of_blades (her post-infested name) first. Or the other way around.

But I'm not really familiar with the franchise, so I could be missing something.

I think you're right FurryPickle, but I'm not super knowledgeable either. I played the original star craft and brood wars when they came out but that was quite a while ago, and things were a bit changed up in SC2. Regardless, I think the two should PROBABLY be aliased in one way or another.

I've always known her as "infested kerrigan" but I'd only played the first one, which named the character "Infested Kerrigan" by default. The wikia article for Queen of Blades pulls it up as a disambiguation with "Infested Kerrigan (often goes by the moniker of the "Queen of Blades")" but I don't know how common that name is since SC2 came out.

They are definitely the same character though.

Alright, since infested_kerrigan is 1, an official name for that form of the character, and 2, it's also a lot more descriptive of what the difference is... I aliased queen_of_blades to --> infested_kerrigan and then implicated infested_kerrigan to --> sarah_kerrigan.