Implicating multiple_poses → pose
Link to implication

Reason:

It's still posing, right?

I think pose should be aliased to posing(now it's the other way around) so that this implication and be done.

It could work.

I don't think we need to change pose to posing though, just make this implication be multiple_poses to --> pose instead.

furrypickle said:
It could work.

I don't think we need to change pose to posing though.

Why not?

Wolfgang415 said:
Why not?

Well, I'm not trying to be argumentative when I say this but, why bother? The differences between the two are negligible, and posing is already aliased to pose, so why put in time and effort to switch it?

Tokaido said:
So why put in time and effort to switch it?

Hmmm... because I think that pose sounds more like an action(like a way of standing) while posing is actually doing it.

Pose used to get mistagged by thousands, but it was by a single user and he seems to have stopped it. He basically tagged everything with it, because the characters were always in some pose (position).

So renaming it to posing could make the usage more obvious. Though I'm not sure if it's necessary, since I don't expect most taggers to make such mistakes.

Genjar said:
I don't expect most taggers to make such mistakes.

Well, the world is not perfect, so there will still be the "single user".

Better than not fixing it, right?

I guess so.
It'd certainly make it less likely to be mistagged in the future. If it happened once, I suppose it can happen again.

Approved implication to pose.