Topic: [APPROVED] Misc. tickling implications BUR

The bulk update request #4891 is active.

create implication tickling_butt (53) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_chin (14) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_tail (12) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_neck (21) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_hooves (8) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_hands (31) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_back (11) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_ears (96) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_chest (14) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_legs (147) -> tickling (9668)
create implication tickling_knees (11) -> tickling_legs (147)
create implication tickling_thighs (117) -> tickling_legs (147)
create implication tickling_toes (119) -> tickling_feet (5018)
create alias tickling_hips (2) -> tickling_sides (410)
create alias tickling_waist (2) -> tickling_sides (410)
create alias tickling_body (3) -> tickling (9668)
create alias tickling_torture (0) -> tickle_torture (5069)

Reason: Tickling feet requires that feet be present to tickle, etc. Tickling_genitalia and the tags under it are not included because we can't tag genital_outline as genitals, but this shouldn't be an issue for the other tags, clothed feet are still tagged feet.
Others are tickling_bodypart tags that don't yet imply tickling. Knees are a part of the leg so tickling_knees and tickling_thighs should imply tickling_legs, right?
All tickling is tickling_body, what else could you possibly tickle that's not part of someone's body.

Should tickling_breasts imply tickling_chest? Are breasts considered chest?
There's also a tickling_crotch tag that I wasn't sure if it was valid or should be aliased away or what

EDIT: The bulk update request #4891 (forum #366705) has been approved by @spe.

Wouldn't it be possible for feet (and some other things) to be out of view or covered, but still have enough context to tell feet are being tickled?

watsit said:
Wouldn't it be possible for feet (and some other things) to be out of view or covered, but still have enough context to tell feet are being tickled?

Ehh... I'm not sure. Maybe?
I'll separate those into their own BUR so the easier stuff can be looked at by itself

The bulk update request #4893 is active.

create implication tickling_anus (44) -> anus (645580)
create implication tickling_breasts (92) -> breasts (2044202)
create implication tickling_butt (53) -> butt (1228128)
create implication tickling_tail (12) -> tail (1736895)
create implication tickling_hooves (8) -> hooves (156442)
create implication tickling_toes (119) -> toes (502469)

Reason: Unsure if what Watsit said above is possible, I haven't found any examples yet, so separating these ones into their own BUR in case this needs to get rejected but the first can be approved

EDIT: The bulk update request #4893 (forum #366712) has been approved by @spe.

Removed tickling_feet -> feet since that already exists now

The bulk update request #4891 (forum #366705) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #4893 (forum #366712) has been approved by @spe.