Topic: [APPROVED] loincloth_only implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4771 is active.

create implication loincloth_only (2383) -> loincloth (30045)
create implication loincloth_only (2383) -> topless (154436)

Reason: As loincloth implies bottomwear, it must follow that a character wearing nothing but a loincloth must not be wearing topwear. Also loincloth_only doesn't yet imply loincloth for some reason.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4771 (forum #364797) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/38457