The bulk update request #4194 is active.

Reason: *sigh* this is gonna take a while, since we apparently missed doing this?
many more coming soon!
Just putting this here for now. discuss away I guess

EDIT: The bulk update request #4194 (forum #358102) has failed: Error: latex_stockings already implies legwear through another implication (create implication latex_stockings -> legwear)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4194 (forum #358102) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

I see no issue with it

The bulk update request #4195 is active.

Reason:
not sure on what to do with these
imply latex_hood -> hood
imply latex_skinsuit -> latex
imply latex_bodysuit -> latex_skinsuit
latex_tight_clothing anyone?

EDIT: The bulk update request #4195 (forum #358105) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4196 is active.

create implication latex_handwear (7388) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_footwear (1635) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_handwear (7388) -> handwear (201157)
create implication latex_footwear (1635) -> footwear (263736)
create alias latex_clothes (2) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_tank_top (22) -> latex_shirt (161)
create implication latex_tank_top (22) -> tank_top (50877)
create implication latex_corset (197) -> latex_lingerie (210)
create implication latex_corset (197) -> latex_topwear (1140)
create implication latex_corset (197) -> corset (10663)
create implication latex_lingerie (210) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_leotard (417) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_leotard (417) -> leotard (15171)

Reason: the last few stragglers that arent in the near single digits in use

EDIT: The bulk update request #4196 (forum #358106) has failed: Error: latex_lingerie already implies clothing through another implication (create implication latex_lingerie -> clothing)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4196 (forum #358106) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

There still seems to be some dispute over whether we should have these tags at all.

topic #36227

The bulk update request #4426 is active.

Reason: Rubber -> latex part 1.1

After months (over a year) of debating on topic #31106 and topic #36227 , we have come to the conclusion that everything rubber-related should be aliased to latex-related tags.

Many users agree that latex is a more commonly used term to describe both the fetish as well as clothing made of such material. Despite the fact that rubber and latex are different by true definition, they are still viewed as similar by the community, with the majority using the term latex.

~~~~~~~~~

I would like to thank everyone for sticking around and providing various insightful arguments. Never thought this would get so much attention.

I also would like to apologize to the entirety of e621 — users and staff — for initially causing a huge mess regarding the two tags. I want to make up for it.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4426 (forum #360867) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4427 is active.

create alias rubber_crop_top (0) -> latex_crop_top (98)
create alias rubber_shirt (1) -> latex_shirt (161)
create alias rubber_tank_top (0) -> latex_tank_top (22)
create alias rubber_thong (0) -> latex_thong (101)
create alias rubber_corset (0) -> latex_corset (197)
create alias rubber_lingerie (0) -> latex_lingerie (210)
create alias rubber_leotard (0) -> latex_leotard (417)
create alias rubber_knee_boots (0) -> latex_knee_boots (8)
create alias rubber_thigh_boots (0) -> latex_thigh_boots (557)

Reason: Rubber -> latex part 1.2

P.S.

Some aliases (such as rubber -> latex) will not be possible at the moment due to the tags having aliases and implications already. New BURs will be made in the foreseeable future to fix this (that is if the current BURs will be approved)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4427 (forum #360868) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Just a reminder: the ‘latex ≠ rubber’ discussions (topic #31106 and topic #36227 ) have concluded and many users have voted for the latex tag to be used.

zenith-pendragon said:
Just a reminder: the ‘latex ≠ rubber’ discussions (topic #31106 and topic #36227 ) have concluded and many users have voted for the latex tag to be used.

so just to clarify, rubber is being aliased to latex therefore not invalidating my work?

cutefox123 said:
so just to clarify, rubber is being aliased to latex therefore not invalidating my work?

Yes. Rubber will be aliased to latex.
Your work is valid 👍

The bulk update request #5801 is active.

create alias latex_clothes (2) -> latex_clothing (26792)
create implication latex_clothing (26792) -> latex (57713)

Reason: not sure why this isn't a thing yet

EDIT: The bulk update request #5801 (forum #380929) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #5801 (forum #380929) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4194 (forum #358102) has failed: Error: latex_stockings already implies legwear through another implication (create implication latex_stockings -> legwear)

The bulk update request #4194 (forum #358102) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4195 (forum #358105) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4196 (forum #358106) has failed: Error: latex_lingerie already implies clothing through another implication (create implication latex_lingerie -> clothing)

The bulk update request #4196 (forum #358106) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4426 (forum #360867) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #4427 (forum #360868) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The tag implication latex_panties -> underwear has been rejected by @spe.