Implicating unknown_artist_signature → signature
Link to implication

Reason:

Seems straightforward.

agreed +1

Also, the unknown_artist_signature tag should be changed to a 'general' type instead of 'artist' just like the signature tag.

blackest_vulture said:
agreed +1

Also, the unknown_artist_signature tag should be changed to a 'general' type instead of 'artist' just like the signature tag.

I can do that easily enough, but note that the unknown_artist tag is currently an artist tag.

blackest_vulture said:
Also, the unknown_artist_signature tag should be changed to a 'general' type instead of 'artist' just like the signature tag.

parasprite said:
I can do that easily enough, but note that the unknown_artist tag is currently an artist tag.

And unknown_species is a species tag, and unknown_character is a character tag. Unknown_artist and unknown_artist_signature are both artist tags.

I honestly would prefer all of them stay that way though. It helps it stay visible and ups the chances someone will see it and identify them. I don't think it really hurts anything to have them already in the appropriate tag category. It also shows we're trying to get them identified even if we don't know the specific yet. It looks more proactive than having all those categories empty and having those tags buried in with the rest of the general tags where they're less likely to be noticed.

The signature tag is a little different then these because it's a trait, not really a request for identification. That's why it fits better as a general tag even if the others aren't.

The implication looks good though, and if the artist is known then it'll just be tagged signature instead. So yeah, approved.