Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
This image apparently has the character tag big_man_(splatoon), but also has zero_pictured. Is this a rare circumstance where both a character tag and zero_pictured can exist on the same post, since this is just regular food and not a food_creature?
If so, would a statue of a character in an image be treated the same way, having both a character tag and zero_pictured?
What about this? It is also tagged with zero_pictured and ambiguous_species. The character is invisible, but we know she's there. Is she pictured, or not?
In regards to the first one, I think a character tag is appropriate if there's something in the image resembling the character. And I would say zero_pictured is appropriate since there's no indication of an actual character, it's just shaped food without any hint of it being animate or living. I'd actually think the post should be deleted since it doesn't have an actual character and because it's just food (an image of an empty bedroom with a pikachu-print blanket wouldn't be acceptable either, I don't think).
The second is trickier since the clothes are positioned as if someone was wearing them; they're upright and are filled out. But I'm not sure if it should be classified as living clothing, or an invisible character (in the latter case, there's no visible furry content, it could be an invisible human for all we know, while in the former case, living clothing would be non-human and technically count as site-relevant).
First post reminds me of post #208943.
watsit said:
The second is trickier since the clothes are positioned as if someone was wearing them; they're upright and are filled out. But I'm not sure if it should be classified as living clothing, or an invisible character (in the latter case, there's no visible furry content, it could be an invisible human for all we know, while in the former case, living clothing would be non-human and technically count as site-relevant).
If it's an invisible character, I'd call it suitably furry. That bow accessory to the side is, in my opinion, floating too low for it to be around an arm or dangling from a hand. The tags list it as a tail_bow, and I'm inclined to agree with that. Without that tail bow, I'd agree with you. Thus, either scenario makes it site-relevant.
