The bulk update request #2983 is active.

create implication censored_balls (102) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_cloaca (6) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_genital_slit (18) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_penis (4102) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_pussy (2087) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_dildo (25) -> censored_sex_toy (28)
create implication censored_anus (358) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_genitalia (6281) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_nipples (518) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_sex_toy (28) -> censored (62604)

Reason: If something specific is censored, that means some form of censorship exists in the post.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2983 (forum #341465) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Maybe it should also imply censored_genitalia -> genitalia, and/or e.g. censored_penis -> penis? I'm not sure if genitalia can be censored enough that you shouldn't tag them, but can still visible enough to tag the specific censored subtag.

Might also be a good opportunity to imply the tags to their body parts (censored_penis --> penis, etc.)

Oh, there's also a censored_face tag.

(like 95% of these posts seem like they should be censored_eyes, but that's not an actual tag so w/e)

animperfectpatsy said:
Maybe it should also imply censored_genitalia -> genitalia, and/or e.g. censored_penis -> penis? I'm not sure if genitalia can be censored enough that you shouldn't tag them, but can still visible enough to tag the specific censored subtag.

strikerman said:
Might also be a good opportunity to imply the tags to their body parts (censored_penis --> penis, etc.)

It's possible for a body part to be completely censored post #302778 post #114283, though perhaps those don't qualify for these tags?

crocogator said:
It's possible for a body part to be completely censored post #302778 post #114283, though perhaps those don't qualify for these tags?

Yeah, my thinking here is that you shouldn’t tag censored_penis if the genital region is so completely covered that the character could have some other kind of genitalia and you wouldn’t know. So these tags implying what they censor should probably be fine.

gattonero2001 said:
The bulk update request #2983 is active.

create implication censored_balls (102) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_cloaca (6) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_genital_slit (18) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_penis (4102) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_pussy (2087) -> censored_genitalia (6281)
create implication censored_dildo (25) -> censored_sex_toy (28)
create implication censored_anus (358) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_genitalia (6281) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_nipples (518) -> censored (62604)
create implication censored_sex_toy (28) -> censored (62604)

Reason: If something specific is censored, that means some form of censorship exists in the post.

Perhaps also add censored_clitoris to the censored_genitalia implications? It hasn’t been used yet, but it would help with future-proofing, plus I have seen plenty of censored clitorises (particularly on Japanese art), so I know it could be populated fairly easily. Could probably make one for censored_urethra, too. I’ve also seen that.

The bulk update request #2983 (forum #341465) has been approved by @gattonero2001.