The bulk update request #2844 is pending approval.

create implication begging_for_death (23) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_to_cum (161) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_for_anal (82) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_not_to_stop (82) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_for_sex (296) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_for_mercy (845) -> begging (6181)
create implication begging_for_more (1032) -> begging (6181) # duplicate of implication #32025
create implication begging_to_stop (507) -> begging (6181)

Reason: begging_* will always involve begging.

begging pose already implies begging, so I believe the remaining ones shouldn't be a problem.

# duplicate of implication #32025

idk what is easier for the staff: reject the solo implication and aprove a BUR, or remove the duplicate from the BUR. I can remove it from the BUR if it's better.

omegaumbra said:
idk what is easier for the staff: reject the solo implication and aprove a BUR, or remove the duplicate from the BUR. I can remove it from the BUR if it's better.

Maybe it's best to link single-implication topics to full BURs so they can make decisions quicker? Can't hurt to try I guess.

# duplicate of implication #32025

hey i made that one!!! that's crazy!!!!!!