The tag alias #57995 <3 -> heart_symbol has been approved.

Reason: Because heart by itself is already aliased to <3 and would be kinda ambiguous between a realistic heart and a heart symbol anyways.

EDIT: The tag alias <3 -> heart_symbol (forum #339400) has been approved by @slyroon.

You put it in backwards. Everything aliases to <3. You'd need a BUR to undo those if you want to change it to from.

furrin_gok said:
You put it in backwards. Everything aliases to <3. You'd need a BUR to undo those if you want to change it to from.

Oh, I thought those other aliases would be updated automatically.

And yeah, I intend to alias away from <3

Looking at the alias request, it appears those will be automatically updated as well. (Altough, I guess there are name changes that would need to be applied as well)

Related threads: topic #27282, topic #32342

I recall people making a big fuss when it comes to aliasing <3 to heart_symbol. I would suggest unimplying everything currently implied with <3 first and then disambiguating it.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Related threads: topic #27282, topic #32342

I recall people making a big fuss when it comes to aliasing <3 to heart_symbol. I would suggest unimplying everything currently implied with <3 first and then disambiguating it.

Ok, I see the arguments against heart_symbol now. Gonna need to rethink the whole thing.

The tag alias <3 -> heart_symbol (forum #339400) has been approved by @slyroon.

end of an era

The bulk update request #6811 is active.

remove implication <3_eyes (0) -> heart_symbol (354493)
remove alias heart_eyes (65494) -> <3_eyes (0)
remove alias heart_in_eyes (0) -> <3_eyes (0)
remove alias hearts_in_eyes (0) -> <3_eyes (0)
remove implication <3_censor (10) -> heart_symbol (354493)
remove implication <3_censor (10) -> censored (63773)
remove alias heart_censor (1782) -> <3_censor (10)
remove alias broken_heart (883) -> </3 (0)
remove alias heart_eyebrows (52) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove alias heart-shaped_eyebrow (0) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove alias heart-shaped_eyebrows (0) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove alias heart_shaped_eyebrows (0) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove alias <3_eyebrow (0) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove alias heart_eyebrow (0) -> <3_eyebrows (5)
remove implication <3_eyebrows (5) -> eyebrows (252839)
create alias <3_pupils (0) -> heart_pupils (3150)
create alias <3_tail (10) -> heart_tail (733)

Reason: About time. These need to be swapped out too.

Part 2:

alias <3_eyes -> heart_eyes
alias heart_in_eyes -> heart_eyes
alias hearts_in_eyes -> heart_eyes
imply heart_eyes -> heart_symbol
alias <3_censor -> heart_censor
imply heart_censor -> heart_symbol
imply heart_censor -> censored
alias </3 -> broken_heart
alias <3_eyebrows -> heart_eyebrows
alias heart-shaped_eyebrow -> heart_eyebrows
alias heart-shaped_eyebrows -> heart_eyebrows
alias heart_shaped_eyebrows -> heart_eyebrows
alias <3_eyebrow -> heart_eyebrows
alias heart_eyebrow -> heart_eyebrows
imply heart_eyebrows -> eyebrows

EDIT: The bulk update request #6811 (forum #392974) has been approved by @slyroon.

nimphia said:
Reason: About time. These need to be swapped out too.

Related pending BUR: topic #32342
For Part 2, I would suggest being wary about certain tags (e.g., <3_eyes) since they are a big mess of overlaps.

The bulk update request #6811 (forum #392974) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6837 is active.

create alias <3_eyes (0) -> heart_eyes (65494)
create alias heart_in_eyes (0) -> heart_eyes (65494)
create alias hearts_in_eyes (0) -> heart_eyes (65494)
create implication heart_eyes (65494) -> heart_symbol (354493)
create alias <3_censor (10) -> heart_censor (1782)
create implication heart_censor (1782) -> heart_symbol (354493)
create implication heart_censor (1782) -> censored (63773)
create alias </3 (0) -> broken_heart (883)
create alias <3_eyebrows (5) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create alias heart-shaped_eyebrow (0) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create alias heart-shaped_eyebrows (0) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create alias heart_shaped_eyebrows (0) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create alias <3_eyebrow (0) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create alias heart_eyebrow (0) -> heart_eyebrows (52)
create implication heart_eyebrows (52) -> eyebrows (252839)

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #6837 (forum #393213) has been approved by @slyroon.

snpthecat said:
create alias <3_eyes (57073) -> heart_eyes (0)
create alias heart_in_eyes (0) -> heart_eyes (0)
create alias hearts_in_eyes (0) -> heart_eyes (0)

Related: topic #34807, forum #341492

Are we making heart_eyes the umbrella tag for every kind of eye hearts/pupils or are we going to differentiate them?

The bulk update request #6837 (forum #393213) has been approved by @slyroon.

forum #341492:

gattonero2001 said:

animperfectpatsy said:
I'd vote to move <3_eyes to heart_eyes and have heart_pupils imply it. Not all instances of hearts in eyes involve the actual pupils being heart-shaped- you can have hearts in the eye alongside the pupil/iris. Or at least that's how I've been applying <3_eyes.

I believe that it would be more useful to separate the three concepts.

• Heart eyes: post #2560003

• Heart pupils: post #2917278

• Hearts in pupils: post #2769247

They are quite visually distinct in my opinion.

Additionally there might be posts in which there are hearts outside of the pupils but contained within the irises, though I can't seem to find any at the moment.

Yeah I see the point of keeping them distinct. Leaving aside the minor issue of hearts outside the pupils (heart_catchlight might work?), where are hearts_in_eyes meant to alias to? It can both mean heart_pupils and hearts_in_pupils. Something feels off about aliasing them to a disambiguation tag.

The bulk update request #6839 is pending approval.

remove alias <3_pupils (0) -> heart_pupils (3150)
create alias heart_in_pupils (135) -> heart_eyes (65494)

Reason:Legitimising the tags
Changed to aliasing them to heart_eyes

Edit: I have no idea what to do with these, help

snpthecat said:
Yeah I see the point of keeping them distinct. Leaving aside the minor issue of hearts outside the pupils (heart_catchlight might work?), where are hearts_in_eyes meant to alias to? It can both mean heart_pupils and hearts_in_pupils. Something feels off about aliasing them to a disambiguation tag.

I think all of them can imply heart_eyes now that it has already been approved.
As for the distinction between heart_pupils and hearts_in_pupils, should we keep them separate or expand heart_pupils to include both instances?

thegreatwolfgang said:
I think all of them can imply heart_eyes now that it has already been approved.

The alias can be removed if there's popular sentiment for t

As for the distinction between heart_pupils and hearts_in_pupils, should we keep them separate or expand heart_pupils to include both instances?

I'm of the opinion that they should be kept separate. If we expand heart_pupils to include both, heart_catchlight becomes a subcategory of heart_pupils too

thegreatwolfgang said:
As for the distinction between heart_pupils and hearts_in_pupils, should we keep them separate or expand heart_pupils to include both instances?

I think they should probably be combined and aliased to heart_eyes. I don't think most taggers would bother with the difference especially with heart_eyes, and the naming doesn't do the greatest job distinguishing them. You can have heart shapes in the iris, pupils, and/or sclera, you can have the pupils or iris in the shape of a heart, or you can have a heart replacing the pupils or iris, or a heart covering part of or replacing the entire eye. Up to now, <3_eyes was the tag for hearts in/on/replacing eyes, which is now aliased to heart_eyes. I wager people will continue to tag <3_eyes/heart_eyes for the general concept, rather than trying to figure out what other tag fits more specifically to how exactly the hearts are displayed in relation to the eyes.

I'm working on drafting a big heart BUR, and leaving so many tags out because I'm unsure on them... Sigh. This will take a while to compose.

Edit: Actually, one step at a time is easier... I'm just gonna make a heart_clothing BUR for now.

auto_moderator said:
The tag alias <3 -> heart_symbol (forum #339400) has been approved by @slyroon.

Godspeed

sipothac said:
end of an era

Alas. I shall miss when it was often the first thing to be seen in the list.

crystali_cast said:
Alas. I shall miss when it was often the first thing to be seen in the list.

At least it still lets me type <3.