agreed
Updated by anonymous
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
agreed
Updated by anonymous
Could be a man-child.
Updated by anonymous
Implicate, not alias
Updated by anonymous
CamKitty said:
Implicate, not alias
Why? This tag doesn't have any wiki page, and it's used in a same way as young tag. Why it is needed?
Updated by anonymous
To me it means a human child.
*shrug*
I guess "young human" could work for people's blacklists too
Updated by anonymous
CamKitty said:
To me it means a human child.*shrug*
I guess "young human" could work for people's blacklists too
ok with two separate tags "young" "human", if it is a young human, human tag will also be added therefore alias and not implication for this thread.
Updated by anonymous
You know, I've just think about it more (and saw admin adding this tag), and maybe this tag was supposed to be used only when parent tag is also present. So people can search for incest involving a parent and a child. Then it would need at least two implications to it (daughter, son), and cleaning because it's used the wrong way. And I don't know if it's worth it. Maybe better option would be something like parent/child tag, or just searching incest age_difference.
Updated by anonymous
For future reference here's reason why this alias was denied:
One of your tag aliases was deleted
Sent by Rainbow_Dash 1 year agoA tag alias you submitted (child → young) was deleted for the following reason: Child is very young (3-12) and young can be older (14-18) should be implication.
Updated by anonymous