Implicating equine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy.

Reason:

There also need to be implication (or maybe alias) to animal_genitalia somewhere.

stuffh8ter said:
Implicating equine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy.

This seems slightly problematic.
If someone searches for anatomically_correct_pussy, I don't think they're looking for toony images, etc.

Consider these, for exampe: #324633 #303456
Equine, yes. Anatomically correct? That's...debatable.

anatomically_correct_* is pretty useless anyway. Just implicate animal_genitalia.

GreyMaria said:
anatomically_correct_* is pretty useless anyway. Just implicate animal_genitalia.

This.

Also, anatomically correct is humourous at best in regard to furries

GreyMaria said:
anatomically_correct_* is pretty useless anyway. Just implicate animal_genitalia.

This would work, unless anatomically_correct refers to anything other than genitalia, in which case, it may be problematic...

Moon_Moon said:
This would work, unless anatomically_correct refers to anything other than genitalia, in which case, it may be problematic...

I'm not suggest implicate all instances of anatomically_correct_* to animal_genitalia, I'm saying that all instances of *_genitalia where * represents an animal be implicated to animal genitalia. We need to simply get rid of the anatomically_correct tags.